Each year, approximately 400 people are killed by electrocution in this country. Many electrocution deaths are caused defectively manufactured, designed or maintained electrical wiring. Our lawyers handle electrocution lawsuits on behalf on injured victims.
Consumer products also put us at risk. Over 150 of these deaths and countless more serious injuries are consumer products related. Many of these injuries are low hazard cases where relatively low electrical currents cause ventricular fibrillation.
Many electrocution accidents and deaths occur on construction sites. Electrocution is the second leading cause of death for construction workers. Many construction cases are workers’ compensations claims in Maryland because the claims are solely against the employer. But there are many electrocution lawsuits that come from on-the-job injuries where another party is also responsible for the injuries or the fatality.
Sample Electrocution Verdicts- Baltimore, Maryland: $200,000 Settlement. A 14-year-old girl is playing in a ball field when she touches a fence charged with nearby voltage. She is instantly killed by the stray electricity and her estate brings suit against the defendants. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants failed to check the underground wires for deficiencies and that barring their negligence the young girl would have lived. The defendants claim that they cannot be held responsible for the damages because they had not worked in the park for several years. This is contradicted by evidence of an electrician bill dated one month before the accident. The government is unable to avoid liability because of the park’s public nuisance issue. Douglas Electric creates a confidential settlement with the plaintiffs. The rest of the defendants settle Baltimore City Circuit Court lawsuit for $200,000 in 2013.
- Rockville, Maryland: $175,000 Settlement. Plaintiff, a power company, negligently allows trees to grow into distribution lines. Plaintiff is electrocuted while in tree and sustained serious burns.
- Prince George's County, Maryland: $ 8,002,000 Verdict. Plaintiff, a 15-year-old female, is walking along a trail in the wooded area behind her stepsister’s apartment complex. The plaintiff comes in contact with a downed power line that is hanging two feet above the trail. The plaintiff instantaneously dies without any evidence of pain and suffering. The plaintiff’s mother and father present a death action suit against the electric company, alleging gross negligence for failing to properly install, maintain, and repair the power line. The plaintiff contends the defendant was aware, or should have been aware, of the conditions of the wire. A wood expert presented by the plaintiff testifies the cross arm the utilities lines were fasted to were excessively knotty. He testifies the knots rendered the cross arm as weak and susceptible to failure. The expert offers evidence that one side of the cross arm fell approximately ten years after its installation. The expert notes that the defendant repaired the fallen line by attaching it to the remaining portion of the cross arm which both he and the plaintiff’s electrician expert claim was improper and dangerous. The plaintiff also presents three separate witnesses, one of which is an electrician by trade who tested the wire with a hot static probe, all who contacted the electric company regarding the downed line within a 30 day period prior to the incident. Only one out of the three calls was reflected on the defendant’s records. The defendant presents records indicating a repairman was sent to the scene before the incident, but showed the repairman was unable to find the fallen line. The defendant denies it was notified more than once regarding the situation and properly responded to the call, which according to their procedure, constituted as a “Priority 1” call. The defendant also argues that even if it were at fault, its actions or inactions could not be constituted as gross negligence, but instead, as simple negligence. The real verdict in this case was much less; $7.5 milliion was in punitive damages that did not stick and the remaining verdict was reduced to $350,000.
- $100,000 Settlement/Defense Verdict in Charles County, Maryland. The plaintiffs, employees of a concrete subcontractor, are placing a concrete footing with a concrete pumping machine. While placing the footing, the pumping boom contacts a high voltage wire and sends electricity into the footer trench and immediately electrocutes and kills the first plaintiff. The second plaintiff is killed while attempting to assist the first plaintiff. The estates of the plaintiffs allege the defendant, the manufacturer of the pumping machine, was liable in failing to properly equipping the insulating component and neglecting to provide adequate warning labels. The defendant contends the insulating components the estates felt were necessary were impractical and unworkable for the construction site. They also indicate the warnings were adequate and the primary cause of the accident was operator negligence. The jury finds in favor of the defendant. Prior to the trial, the second defendant, the seller of the concrete machine, settled with the plaintiffs’ estates for $100,000. Harleysville Mutual offered an additional $100,000 before trial but plaintiffs' demand was $2 million.
If you or a loved one has suffered from an electric shock that caused injury or death in Maryland, you can speak to a lawyer for a free, no obligation consultation at 800-553-8082 or get an online case evaluation.
Sample Pleadings in Workplace Accident Lawuits- Sample Complaint (sample fork lift accident wrongful death lawsuit)
- Sample Answer (sample answer from defendant in a forklift accident lawsuit)
- Sample Opening Statement from burn accident wrongful death)