Sample Pretrial Statement

Below is a full template of a pretrial statement from a premises liability case tried in Baltimore City by Ron Miller and Laura Zois.

The jury returned a verdict of more than $500,000 in a case where the pretrial offer was $100,000 and contributory negligence was a central issue.

This example includes the essential components of the statement that helped establish the trial narrative and contributed to the favorable outcome. It is followed by a breakdown of the statement’s structure and strategic purpose, allowing trial lawyers to model their own with clarity, credibility, and precision.

Example Pretrial Statement

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND

NATASHA BEVENS
– Plaintiff

v

SEA SYSTEMS
– Defendant

CASE NO. 0702-0000000-2011

Plaintiff, Natasha Bevens, by and through her attorneys, Ronald V. Miller, Jr., Laura G. Zois, and Miller & Zois, LLC, offers this Honorable Court Plaintiff’s Pretrial Statement in the above-referenced matter.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Plaintiff Natasha Bevens was working the overnight shift as a building service worker at Holabird Middle School when the power suddenly went out in the early morning hours. The lights cut off. An alarm began blaring. In the confusion and darkness, Ms. Bevens did exactly what she was trained to do: she called her supervisor. Following instructions, she made her way to the school’s electrical room to investigate and silence the alarm. The space was pitch black. As she stepped inside, trusting the familiar layout of a room she had entered countless times before, she walked toward the alarm panel. Without warning, her foot plunged into an uncovered hole in the floor—left behind by contractors who had worked there the day before.

That contractor was Defendant Sea Systems, Inc. The company had been performing work in the electrical room less than 24 hours before Ms. Bevens’s fall and failed to either cover the opening or post any warnings. They left the hazard behind, invisible in the dark and waiting for someone like Ms. Bevens to walk right into it.

The consequences were immediate and devastating. Ms. Bevens suffered a complex, open fracture and dislocation of her right ankle. She required surgery involving orthopedic hardware. She now lives with permanent nerve damage that will necessitate pain management for the remainder of her life. She was 38 years old at the time of the incident, with a projected life expectancy of 43.6 more years, a timeline now shadowed by chronic pain and physical limitations that never needed to happen.

COUNTERCLAIMS, CROSS-CLAIMS, THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

None.

AMENDMENTS REQUIRED OF THE PLEADINGS:

None.

SIMPLIFICATIONS OR LIMITATIONS OF ISSUES

Plaintiff has served Defendant with Requests for Admissions, which could simplify some of the issues in the case; however, Defendant has not yet responded to the Requests.

ITEMIZATION OF DAMAGES

The plaintiff claims the following special damages to date:

JHU Bayview Medical Center $17,863.60
Lifestar Response of Maryland $374.00
All About Home Care $720.00
JHU Physicians $15,582.15
KCI USA, Inc. $4,086.00
HomeCall, Inc. $919.00
LabCorp $153.00
Robert Kissing, M.D. $11,158.00
Concentra Medical Center $306.27
Rehab at Work $1,059.00
First Rehabilitation Resources $1,096.94
Walgreens (Prescriptions) $2,748.42
Drug City (Prescriptions) $8,653.38
Injured Workers Pharmacy (Prescriptions) $5,319.78
Total Medical Bills to Date $70,039.54
Past Lost Wages $32,576.80
Future Medical Expenses $19,459.77
Total Economic Damages $122,076.11

Plaintiff reserves the right to make a claim for non-economic damages for pain and suffering incurred in the past, and pain and suffering that is reasonably expected to be incurred in the future. Plaintiff also intends to present evidence of the need for future medical treatment, including, but not limited to, pain management, office visits three times per year, and orthopedic consults at least once per year.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS TO BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE:

  1. Medical Records and Bills of the Plaintiff;
  2. A Summary of Plaintiff’s Medical Specials;
  3. Defendant Sea System’s Answers to Interrogatories;
  4. Incident Report;
  5. Deposition Transcript of Witness Warren Bright;
  6. Deposition Transcript of Witness John Damron;
  7. Deposition Transcript of Witness Mark Robinson;
  8. Deposition Transcript of Andrew Kinman;
  9. Deposition Transcript of Averell Reinhart;
  10. Deposition Transcript of Scott Snyder;
  11. Photographs of the area where the incident took place;
  12. Demonstrative video of the Plaintiff’s surgical procedure;
  13. Demonstrative anatomical exhibits of Plaintiff’s ankle;
  14. Radiological Imaging of Plaintiff’s ankle;
  15. Life table of the Plaintiff;
  16. Documents produced by Defendant;
  17. Relevant portions of authoritative sources relied upon by experts;
  18. Diagram of the electrical room; and

Deposition Exhibits

The plaintiff reserves the right to introduce any documents exchanged during the course of discovery that are not specifically identified above.

PLAINTIFF’S LIST OF NON-EXPERT WITNESSES:

  1. Plaintiff, Rachel Bevens;
  2. Defendant, Sea Systems Inc. corporate representative;
  3. Witness, Mark Robinson;
  4. Witness, John Damon;
  5. Witness, John Dunst;
  6. Defendant Employee, Andrew Linman;
  7. Defendant Employee, Averell Meinhart;
  8. Defendant Employee, Steve Snyder;
  9. Margaret Bevens;
  10. Dennis Bevens;
  11. Barbara Williams;
  12. Mary Wood.

Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witnesses identified by either party during the course of discovery not listed above.

PLAINTIFF’S LIST OF EXPERT WITNESSES

  1. Dr. LeBron Wade, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21124, is an expert in the field of emergency medicine and general surgery, and orthopedic surgery;
  2. Dr. Kobe Gasol, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, is an expert in the field of general medicine, rehabilitation, and pain management; and
  3. Kevin Westbrook, CSP, P.E., SPA, Inc., 203 West 11th Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21225, is an expert in the field of Workplace Safety and Human Factors.

Respectfully submitted,
Miller & Zois, LLC

Laura G. Zois
1 South St, #2450
Baltimore, MD 21202
(410)779-4600
Attorney for the Plaintiff

Certificate of Service

I, Laura G. Zois, do hereby certify that a copy of Plaintiff’s foregoing Pretrial Statement was hand-delivered on this ___day of ________, to:

Franklin & Prokopik
Two North Charles Street, Suite 600
Balti
more, Maryland 21201
Attorneys for Defendant

Laura G. Zois

Writing a Pretrial Statement

There are two kinds of pretrial statements. The first kind is perfunctory. We have all seen them. They are a stitched-together list of facts, witnesses, and exhibits written for compliance. The second kind tells the court what the case is really about, makes the defense uncomfortable, and quietly signals that you are ready for trial. That is the kind you want to write. Whether you are setting up a clean path to verdict or building leverage for settlement, a strategically crafted pretrial statement helps shape how your case will be tried, managed, and valued.

Writing a Pretrial Statement That Actually Moves the Needle

A pretrial statement is more than a formality. Done well, it is the first draft of your trial narrative, the first test of your credibility with the judge, and the first time the defense sees how serious you are about taking the case to verdict. It is not just about organizing facts. It is about imposing structure and intention on the chaos that is civil litigation.

Too often, lawyers treat pretrial statements as a clerical chore. That is a mistake. Judges read these. So do adjusters and defense lawyers who have not yet run the numbers on what a trial will cost them. A good pretrial statement gives them a reason to pick up the phone. A great one makes them nervous if they do not.

Here is how to write one that does real work for your case.

Know Your Jurisdiction Cold

Every jurisdiction has its quirks. Some courts want headings formatted a certain way, some require joint statements, and some will use this document to structure voir dire or control time limits at trial. Know the local rules. If your format is sloppy or off-base, the judge will assume your case is, too. And do not just look at the rules. Look at what the other serious trial lawyers in your venue are doing. This is one of the few parts of your case that the court reads before opening statements. You want to look like you have done this before.  So do not just cut-and-paste this pretrial and use it in South Dakota without finding out how things play there.

Lead With the Right Tone

Your header should include the court name, case number, parties, and date. More importantly, your title and opening paragraph should do two things. First, establish that you are ready to try the case; second, tell the court what this case is really about. Not just slip and fall or rear-end collision, but a betrayal of safety, a failure to warn, a loss of mobility. You are not trying to win with rhetoric here, as we will talk about in a second. You are setting the emotional tone.

Stick the Facts (Save the Fire)

The statement of facts is not a closing argument. It is a test of your discipline. Be specific, chronological, and neutral in tone. Judges use this section to gauge your credibility and clarity. Resist the urge to editorialize, as hard as they can be when you are all worked up in advocacy mode. Focus on key facts that matter: timing, warnings, conduct, and injuries. Let the strength of your case speak for itself. Do not turn this into a position paper. Show that you can distill the story without embellishment.

Frame the Issues Legally and Practically

Lay out the legal issues, but do it with an eye toward what the jury will actually be deciding. Do not just list negligence or causation. Translate those into the real questions: whether the contractor created a hazard, whether the plaintiff had any way of knowing about it, and whether the pain is permanent. If the defense has raised affirmative defenses or counterclaims, flag them here. Resist the urge to litigate them. This is not the brief. This is the map.

Name the Witnesses Who Matter

This is where most lawyers play their hand too lightly. Do not just list names and addresses. Give one line of what each witness will say and why it matters. That includes your client. That includes your experts. If you have a treating physician who will come off polished and likable, say that. If the defense is sending a corporate representative who gave you gold in deposition, flag it. You want the court and the other side to know who is moving the chains.

Make Your Exhibits Count

List everything, but group them strategically: medical records, liability documents, demonstratives. If there is a video or diagram that will effectively illustrate your theory, highlight it. Do not make the court dig. If you have exhibits that will be the subject of motions in limine, anticipate the pushback now by framing them as essential, probative, and properly noticed.

Stipulations: Push Where You Can

If you have clean stipulations, such as authenticity of records, qualifications of experts, or basic background facts, use them. They make you look like a professional. They also save time, which courts increasingly appreciate. If the defense is dragging its feet or refusing to concede anything, that can be useful too. Judges pay attention to who is being reasonable.

Trial Logistics: Be the Adult in the Room

Outline your estimated trial length, your witness order, and any scheduling issues. This is not the place to be vague. If you can project calm, control, and clarity, you will score points with the bench that might pay off later in terms of credibility with the court. If you plan to file motions in limine, note that here. It signals you are thinking several steps ahead.

Say Where the Case Stands on Settlement

Be brief but honest. If mediation failed, say so. If the defense has offered policy limits, note that. If you believe trial is necessary because liability is denied or damages are lowballed, state it plainly. Judges appreciate knowing how close or how far you are from a deal. It informs their management of voir dire, jury selection, and how they will handle the trial calendar.

The best pretrial statements do not read like forms. They read like previews. They give the court a coherent, focused version of the case, and they give the defense a reason to recalculate their risk. Be deliberate. Be restrained. And above all, be clear. A judge should be able to read this and understand exactly what the case is about, who is credible, and why a jury might care. If you can do that, you are already winning.

More Personal Injury Samples

client-reviews
Client Reviews
★★★★★
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information