Sample Discovery Requests in Personal Injury Lawsuits

Sample Discovery in Personal Injury Cases

Below are the links to examples of discovery you can use in preparing and defending negligence claims:

What Is Discoverable in Maryland?

Rule 400(c) sets out the general scope of discovery in a Maryland personal injury case:


    1. Scope of Discovery — In General.

Unless otherwise ordered by the court parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action,

      1. whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, and
      2. including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents or other tangible things, and
      3. including any information of the witness or party, however obtained, as to the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter, and
      4. whether or not any of such matters is already known to or otherwise obtainable by the party seeking discovery, and
      5. whether or not the information will be inadmissible at the trial, if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

What Does This Discovery Rule Mean for Plaintiffs Bringing a Claim?

This rule means that you are going to get a lot of questions that you don’t like in interrogatories and, more annoyingly, at your deposition. Just because a question seems irrelevant to your case, defense counsel can still ask the question if it might lead to information that could be admissible. Whether our interrogatory responses are substantive or we object depends on how invasive the interrogatory is.

Let’s take an example: do you have a boyfriend? On its face, this is completely irrelevant to the claim you are making, right? What does that have to do with your injuries and the harm that was done to you?

But you are required to answer these types of questions because it could lead to information that would be important at trial. Let’s say you give the name of this boyfriend. The defendants might take his deposition and find out that you had a knee injury hiking just a week before your traffic collision.

How far can the defendants’ attorneys go with this? It is not always clear. It is the job of the plaintiff’s counsel protect their client if the defendant goes too far asking questions that could not lead to evidence that could be used at trial.

Related Links

  • Sample objections to inappropriate questions
  • Get more discovery samples and everything you need to prepare and try a personal injury case
Client Reviews
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information