Slip and Fall Settlement Payouts in Maryland

The lawyers at Miller & Zois have handled countless premises liability or slip and fall injury cases all over Maryland.

In a slip and fall case, the plaintiff asserts that they slipped and injured themselves due to some unsafe condition (e.g., slippery or greasy floor with no warning) that the property owner negligently failed to address or correct. Injuries resulting from a slip and fall can range from minor to severe.

A surprising number of slip-and-fall incidents actually result in death. Slip and fall accidents at nursing homes result in a large number of fatalities every year.

What is a Slip and Fall Case Worth in Maryland?

The national median award for industrial/commercial premises liability cases is $345,000, while the median amount for all other premises liability claims is $105,000.

The value of a slip and fall case will be driven by two separate factors: (1) the nature and severity of the injuries and (2) the extent of the property owner’s negligence and resulting liability. The impact of the first fact is pretty obvious.

A slip and fall that results in minor injuries, such as a sprained wrist or some bruising, will naturally be worth much less than a case where someone slips and breaks a leg or worse. The second factor relating to the extent of the property owner’s negligence is more complex. Usually, it depends on the type of hazard or dangerous condition that caused the slip and fall: e.g., a wet floor with no warning, snow and ice, or dangerous design or construction.

Even when a slip and fall results in serious injury, this second factor can often render the case worthless. In most cases, the plaintiff must show that the property owner had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazardous condition to establish liability. For example, if a customer walks into a store and slips on a banana peel, they would need to prove that (a) the store owner or employees actually knew about the banana peel or (b) that under the circumstances, the store owner or employees reasonably should have known about the banana peel. The case could be worth nothing if the plaintiff cannot prove notice.

Liability is much easier in cases where the property owner or its employees created the hazardous condition. The classic example of this is when an employee mops the storeroom floor. In this case, the plaintiff does not have to prove actual or constructive knowledge of the wet floor. The property owner is the one who made the floor wet, so knowledge is presumed.

Summary of Maryland Slip and Fall Verdicts & Settlements

Reported verdicts and settlements indicate that about 68% of Maryland slip and fall cases had a value somewhere between $5,000 and $50,000. Just under 5% of the cases had a final value in excess of $500,000. The highest reported verdict was $4.2 million which came in a 2002 case in Prince George’s County where the Plaintiff slipped on ice, broke her leg and ended up with a bone infection.

It would be great if there were a slip-and-fall settlement value calculator where we could punch in some numbers. However, there is no expected formula to predict the settlement value of a slip-and-fall case in Maryland. But a review of these cases shows that in Maryland, there are at least three factors that will consistently impact the calculation of the value of a slip and fall case: (1) the severity of injury, (2) the nature and extent of the property owners’ negligence and liability; and (3) the jurisdiction which the case is filed in. Below is a summary of these factors and a review of example cases.

• More verdicts and settlements in slip and fall cases and a few more factors we think to drive values in these cases

Severity of Injury

The impact of this first factor is evident in any personal injury case: the more serious the injury, the more a case will be worth. But this is particularly true in slip-and-fall cases. Many slip and fall cases involve minor injuries such as a sprained wrist or bruising. The value of these types of cases will always be comparatively low. Unless there are other aggravating factors, the value of a typical minor injury slip and fall case will be under $20,000. Below are several examples of typical slip and fall cases involving minor injuries and no other aggravating factors:

• (2022) Durm v. Walmart (Baltimore): The plaintiff was shopping in the produce section of Walmart when she tripped and fell over an empty four-wheel cart used to store overstock bananas beneath the banana display table. The cart was lying close to the floor when the plaintiff’s foot struck it. The plaintiff alleged that she sustained injuries, including tears to her right hip, hamstring, and thigh, as well as Grade IV chondromalacia patella of her knee.
• (2017) Wachuku v. Home Properties (Montgomery County). The plaintiff was awarded $9,200 for minor injuries incurred when she tripped and fell in a stairway that was poorly lit by the property owner.
• (2012) Sharpe v. Shoppers’ Food Warehouse (Baltimore County): The plaintiff received $11,400 for minor physical injuries caused by a slip and fall on a wet floor with no warnings in the produce department of a grocery store.
• (2007) Perry v. Chick-fil-A (Howard County): The plaintiff was awarded $20,000 for slipping and falling on the icy parking lot while walking into a Chick-fil-A in Columbia. The injuries, which included a concussion, could still be classified as minor.
• (2006) Strobel v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (Anne Arundel County) Plaintiff got $9,000 for a strained back and other minor injuries incurred when she slipped and fell on a cardboard box left in the middle of a hallway.

When the plaintiff’s injuries are more significant, the value of these otherwise ordinary slip-and-fall cases can increase significantly. Below are examples of a few cases where a typical slip and fall resulted in more severe injury.

• (2007) Ferguson v. Frederick Westview Properties LLC (Frederick County): The plaintiff was awarded $153,000 when she slipped and fell on a patch of ice at a shopping center in Frederick. The circumstances of her slip and fall were typical, but she fell awkwardly and sustained a permanent injury to her shoulder, requiring shoulder replacement surgery.
• (2004) Glidden v. Outback Steakhouse (P.G. County): Plaintiff claimed she tripped over a waiter because the restaurant was poorly lit. The plaintiff’s injuries from the fall were significant as she broke her wrist and also fractured her hip. She was awarded $160,000.

In cases where the slip and fall is particularly violent or results in death or very serious and permanent injuries, the value of the case can skyrocket.

• (2007) Jaro v. Union Memorial Hosp. (Baltimore City): The plaintiff was a doctor who slipped on a wet hospital floor, and the impact was particularly hard. The doctor suffered a stress fracture in one of his vertebrae that required three separate surgeries. The injury was permanent and effectively ended his career. The case was settled for $1.5 million.
• (2002) Lockwood v. Centre Group L.P
  . (P.G. County): The Plaintiff slipped and fell on a patch of ice that the defendant failed to treat. As a result of the fall, the plaintiff suffered compound fractures of both her fibula and tibia bones in her right leg. Complications arose during her recovery, and the plaintiff developed osteomyelitis – a rare and severe infection of the bone. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $4.2 million.

Nature and Extent of Property Owner Liability

Even when a slip and fall results in serious injury, this second factor can render the case worthless. In most slip-and-fall lawsuits, the plaintiff must show that the property owner had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazardous condition to establish liability. For example, if a customer walks into a store and slips on a banana peel, the plaintiff would need to prove that (a) the store owner or employees actually knew about the banana peel or (b) that under the circumstances, the store owner or employees reasonably should have known about the banana peel. The case could be worth nothing if the plaintiff cannot provide notice.

Liability is much easier in cases where the property owner or its employees created the hazardous condition. The classic example is when an employee mops the storeroom floor. In this case, the plaintiff does not have to prove actual or constructive knowledge of the wet floor. The property owner made the floor wet, so knowledge is presumed.

An example can be found in an unreported Maryland appellate opinion from 2024.  In Cade v. Arrow Parking, the plaintiff tripped and fell while exiting an unleveled elevator in a parking garage located at 210 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201.

Arrow Parking disputed these allegations and denied having notice, actual or constructive, that the elevator was un-leveled before the plaintiff’s fall. Arrow Parking further contended that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent and that the un-leveling of the elevator was an open and obvious condition, such that Arrow Parking had no duty to warn the plaintiff.

The jury awarded the plaintiff over $1 million.

How to Value Slip and Fall Lawsuits for Settlement

Slip and fall cases can be challenging to value, as the severity of the injuries and the impact on the victim’s life can vary widely from case to case. There are several factors that lawyers, insurance adjusters, and juries may consider when determining a settlement amount:

• Liability: One of the most critical factors in a slip and fall case is determining who is at fault for the accident. If the property owner or operator is found negligent in maintaining the premises, they may be liable for the victim’s injuries and damages. This is important in any jurisdiction, particularly in Maryland, because Maryland has contributory negligence.  Contributory negligence is a legal doctrine that only a few states still have that bars a plaintiff from recovering damages if they are found to have contributed to their own injuries, even if the defendant was 99% negligent.
• Severity of Injuries: The extent of the victim’s injuries and their impact on their daily life will play a huge role in determining the settlement amount the defendant is responsible for. Factors such as the need for medical treatment, the duration of recovery, and the long-term impact on the victim’s quality of life can all be considered.
• Lost Wages: If the victim cannot work due to their injuries, they may be entitled to compensation for lost wages and future earning potential.
• Pain and Suffering: Slip and fall victims may also be compensated for physical pain, emotional distress, and other non-economic damages.

Jurisdiction Where Case is Filed

One more significant factor to consider: slip and fall settlement amounts. A review of the reported jury payouts and settlement amounts underscores that the value of a slip-and-fall case can often depend on what Maryland county the case is filed in. Slip and fall cases in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions such as Baltimore City and Prince George’s County are consistently worth more than comparable cases in other counties.

For example, in the case of White v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corporation, the plaintiff got $35,000 for minor injuries after slipping on a wet floor in the grocery store’s produce section. The facts and circumstances in White were virtually identical to another “produce section” slip case against Shoppers (Sharpe v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corporation).

The plaintiff in Sharpe arguably had more severe injuries but only $11,400. The only apparent explanation is that Sharpe was in Baltimore County. The damages in White were awarded by a P.G. County jury. Another example of this is the case of Dunlin v. Two Farms Inc. In Dunlin, neither of the first two factors were particularly strong – the plaintiff’s injuries were comparatively minor, and the defendant claimed it placed adequate warning signs – but a jury in Baltimore City awarded $120,000 to the plaintiff.

Lawyers, insurance adjusters, and juries may use different methods to determine the settlement amount in slip-and-fall cases. When negotiating a settlement with the insurance company, lawyers may consider the victim’s medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. Insurance adjusters may use formulas that consider the injuries’ severity and impact on the victim’s life. Juries may consider all these factors and more when determining a verdict in a slip-and-fall case. Ultimately, the settlement amount will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the evidence presented by the victim and their legal team.

Getting a Lawyer for Your Claim

If you have a serious slip-and-fall injury case in Maryland, we can help you understand your options and the value of your claim. Call us at 800-553-8082 or get a free Internet consultation.

Litigation Resources