Sample Motions In Limine

Below are sample motions in limine we have filed in our personal injury cases. These may be of assistance to you should you be presented with an issue similar to the one presented in our case.

Motion in Limine

We may also have deleted the name of the client, court or witnesses in specific instances for confidentially. (Some of our clients have also graciously agreed to allow us to include their names.) The substance of the motions, however, have generally remained intact.

Miller & Zois is committed to the continued education of other personal injury attorneys who are fighting on behalf of injured clients. If you have any motions that you believe would be of assistance to other attorneys representing injured victims, please forward them to us, and we will, if appropriate, put them up here.

You can also find other sample motions in tort cases and even more motions in limine here.

Expert Related Motions in LimineOther Motions in LimineDefense Motions in Limine
  • Preclude doctor testifying against nurse
  • Preclude expert testifying about future surgeries
  • Preclude evidence defendant driver was underinsured or even mentioning uninsured motorist carrier
  • Motion to exclude videos depicting a below knee amputation
  • Motion to exclude evidence of hospital protocols in malpractice case
Thoughts on Motions in Limine in Maryland motioninlimine

The phrase in limine in Latin means "on the threshold." Motions in limine are used to prohibit or limit certain testimony or evidence at trial. A motion in limine in a personal injury case is a motion typically made before the trial starts but can be made at any time before or during a trial.

In what situation is a motion in limine appropriate?  You should file a motion in limine if you believe there is evidence the defendant might introduce a trial that could be objected to at trial because it is incompetent or irrelevant.  A motion in limine is also appropriate if you believe the evidence that defendant might want to introduce at trial is unduly prejudicial to your client. 

In most courts, lawyers must file any motion within fifteen days before trial.  The deadline will be set either by rule or by the scheduling order.  Many judges view motions in limine as a form of preliminary injunction. In other words, the moving party would be irreparably harmed by waiting for an in-trial objection - after the cat is already out of the bag in a sense. It also just makes the trial go smoother to resolve these issue up front. (Smooth trials are generally better for the plaintif.)

Consequently, the standard in Maryland for granting such relief is whether any reference to the evidence the moving party seeks to exclude is so prejudicial that the nonmoving party may not refer to it. This is particularly important if you do not want to the defense counsel referencing the evidence at issue in defendant's opening statement (where an objection is more difficult).

Lawyers must also remain mindful of the scope of the relief sought and should reflect that request in a draft order for the trial court's signature. It is important that the order contains language that is narrowly tailored to the inappropriate evidence. Judges are reticent to exclude broad categories of evidence but may be more receptive to a more narrow request.

If you are on the losing side of the court's ruling to exclude evidence, it is important to remember that, unlike many judicial orders, orders in limine are interlocutory and not final decisions on the admissibility of evidence. Accordingly, it is not inappropriate to request a reversal or modification of a prior ruling, particularly if the request is based on a different presentation of evidence than the trial court was led to believe would be presented. In fact, these arguments often need to be raised again because a denial does not always preserve the record for appeal, particularly if the argument is the judge's chambers.

More Samples in Malpractice, Products and Car Accident Cases
  • Take a look at settlement demand packages
  • Our Attorney Help Page: use this nationally renouned resource to get templates for anything and everything related to malpractice and motor tort cases

Contact Us For a Free Consultation

1Free Consultation

2Available to talk NOW - 24/7

3No fees unless you WIN

Miller & Zois clients have received over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements. Let us fight for you!

Client Reviews

They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives.
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens, Google User
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer, Google User
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen, Google User
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
★★★★★

Contact Us

Free Consultation (800) 553-8082 Call 24/7