Example Consent Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines

Sometimes in litigation the scheduling deadlines sneak up on both parties. Often this is because the lawyers involved are too busy or lazy to push the case forward.

But there are some complex cases, like the malpractice claim below, that have too many busy experts to schedule and depose in a relatively short period of time before the deadline prescribed by the court in the scheduling order. This can be a particular challenge in the COVID era, obviously.

This motion to extend discovery is joint discovery extension request from all parties to the litigation.


* CASE NO. 13-C-17-114047 MM

* * * * * * * * * * * *

CourtroomPlaintiff, James Evans, by and through his attorneys, Justin P. Zuber and Miller & Zois, LLC, files this “Consent” Motion to Extend the Discovery Deadline and in support thereof states as follows:

  1. This is a complicated medical malpractice action involving multiple experts and witnesses.
  2. In fact, there are 15 medical experts between the parties, many of which are out of state.
  3. Despite the parties’ best efforts, due to scheduling and calendaring difficulties, and due to the number of fact, party and expert witnesses involved in this matter, all depositions have not been completed.
  4. In particular, it has been difficult scheduling expert witness depositions because of COVID, the attorneys’ schedules, and the witnesses’ pre-planned work schedules that include clinical duties and surgery.
  5. The Parties are working harmoniously to calendar these depositions to take place within the next couple of months.
  6. The parties need additional time to complete discovery in this complicated medical malpractice case.
  7. It is for these reasons that the parties request an extension of the following case deadlines: Current Deadline Proposed New Deadline Discovery Deadline: March 10, 2021 June 10, 2021Pretrial Statement Drafts: March 19, 2021 June 12, 2021

    Final Pretrial Statement: March 26, 2021 June 18, 2021

    Pretrial Settlement Conference: April 4, 2021June 26, 2021

  8. The current dates for the pretrial on July 9, 2021 and trial on July 30, 2021 would remain the same.
  9. Granting this Joint Motion will further the interest of justice and fulfill the purpose of the discovery rules, ensuring that the parties appear at trial with a full understanding of the facts and anticipated testimony. Kelch v. Mass Transit Admin., 287 Md. 223, 229 (1980) (“the basic objective in providing for discovery is ‘to require disclosure of facts by a party litigant to all of his adversaries, and thereby to eliminate, as far as possible, the necessity of any party to litigation going to trial in a confused or muddled state of mind, concerning the facts that give rise to litigation.”)
  10. The extension of these case deadlines will not affect any other deadlines in this case and will not result in the postponement of the trial that is scheduled for July 30, 2021.
  11. That undersigned counsel contacted all defense counsel of record in this case and we all consent to this request to push back these deadlines.

WHEREFORE it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court extend the case deadlines, including the discovery deadline.

Respectfully submitted,
Miller & Zois, LLC


Justin P. Zuber, Esq.

Rodney M. Gaston, Esq.
1 South Street, Suite 2450
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
T: (410) 553-6000
F: (844) 712-5151
Client Protection Fund No.: 0812180339
Attorneys for Plaintiff

I, Justin P. Zuber, Esquire, certify, pursuant to Maryland Rule 1-322.1, that the this pleading does not include any individual’s Social Security number, taxpayer identification number, or the alpha or numeric characters of a financial or medical account identifier and does not contain “restricted information” as defined in Rule 20-101(f)(1)(B).


Justin P. Zuber, Esq.

Client Reviews
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information