Sample Medical Malpractice Expert Certificate of Merit

Below, you will find a sample Certificate of Merit. We provide this sample to assist malpractice lawyers in understanding the essential components and detailed analysis required for such certificates.

Obviously, the Certificate of Merit and the doctor’s report these documents play a crucial role in establishing the foundation for a malpractice claim. You certainly want to measure twice and cut once because a mistake will come back to haunt you.

Sample Certificate of Merit in a Malpractice Lawsuit

HESTER PRYNNE
Claimant

v.

UNITED STATES RADIOLOGY SERVICES
and
ROGER CHILLINGWORTH, M.D.

Health Care Providers

Certificate of Qualified Expert

Arthur Dimmesdale, M.D. hereby certifies as follows:

I, Arthur Dimmesdale, M.D., am a licensed physician, board-certified in Radiology, the same specialty in which Health Care Provider Roger Chillingworth, M.D. is certified. I have a particular interest in ultrasonography and am a Professor of Radiology at Boston University Medical Center. My clinical experience, consultation work, and teaching within the past five years cover radiology in general and, specifically, ultrasonography. My experience includes working with and supervising non-physician sonographers. Radiology and ultrasonography are the medical fields practiced by the Health Care Providers involved in this matter, specifically United States Radiology Services and Roger Chillingworth, M.D., through their agents, servants, and employees.

I have reviewed the obstetrical ultrasound performed by the Defendants on Hester Prynne on December 10, 2022, and the report of that study. Additionally, I have reviewed the obstetrical ultrasound and its interpretation from February 18, 2023, conducted at 19.8 weeks gestation, along with the report of that study, including the fetal anatomy survey. On February 18, 2023, the fetal anatomy survey and the report listed M. Hibbins as the “sonographer” and Roger Chillingworth, M.D. as the “physician” of United States Radiology Services stationery.

Further, I have examined the following records from Sinai Hospital of Baltimore:

  • Report of head CT from June 30, 2023
  • Neurologic consultation by Beverly Crusher, M.D., from July 1, 2023
  • Report of MRI of the head/brain from September 20, 2023

Additionally, I reviewed Hester Prynne’s prenatal records, including blood tests, amniocentesis results, and genetic counseling notes, to understand the context of her prenatal care. I also reviewed the communication logs between United States Radiology Services and the referring obstetrician, highlighting potential gaps in the communication of critical findings.

Based on my review of these medical records and radiologic films and drawing on my education, training, experience, expertise, and knowledge of the facts of this case, it is my opinion, with a reasonable degree of medical probability, that the care provided to Hester Prynne by United States Radiology Services and Roger Chillingworth, M.D., through their agents, servants, and employees, deviated from the applicable standard of care. They negligently performed, interpreted, communicated, and/or documented the February 18, 2023, obstetrical ultrasound and fetal anatomy survey. Had the lateral ventricles of the fetal brain been properly imaged and interpreted, and the findings communicated and/or documented, semi-lobar holoprosencephaly, a severe congenital brain disorder, would have been promptly diagnosed. The ordering obstetrician and the patient would have been informed of the congenital brain abnormality, enabling informed consent, counseling, and the option to terminate the pregnancy.

Moreover, there was a failure to follow up on abnormal findings noted in the initial ultrasound, and the absence of a second opinion or further imaging studies compounded the oversight. With a reasonable degree of medical probability, the lapses in standard care by the United States Radiology Services and Roger Chillingworth, M.D., directly and through their agents, servants, and employees, proximately caused Pearl Prynne to be born with semi-lobar holoprosencephaly. This has led to extraordinary expenses for medical care, specialized therapies, and adaptive equipment, as well as significant emotional and mental suffering for her parents.

Attached is a detailed report of my opinion, which is incorporated herein. My opinions are expressed with a reasonable degree of medical probability. Less than 20% of my annual professional activities involve testimony in personal injury claims.

Tips for Filing a Certificate of Merit in Maryland

Understand the Legal Requirements

  • Maryland law requires a Certificate of Merit to be filed in any medical malpractice case to show that the claim has merit.
  • The certificate must be signed by a qualified medical expert who attests that the defendant healthcare provider failed to meet the applicable standard of care and that this failure caused harm to the patient.

Choose a Qualified Expert:

  • Ensure that the medical expert is qualified in the same field as the defendant healthcare provider. So, for example, if the defendant is a cardiologist, your expert should also be a board-certified cardiologist. There is a lot of law out there about when you can offer expert testimony in related specialities.  Why play with fire if you can avoid it? You are better off finding someone board-certified in the same thing as the defendant.  If the defendant was practicing outside of their practice area, you should get experts in both.
  • The credibility of the expert witness is paramount. Choose someone with substantial experience, a strong professional reputation, and a history of providing clear and persuasive testimony. Remember you have an audience of two: the hospital or insurance company and a jury.

Detailed Expert Review:

  • The expert should conduct a comprehensive review of the medical records and provide a detailed analysis of how the standard of care was breached.  The number one way an expert gets burned?  Not doing what the should have done before offering their opinion.
  • Do not forget causation. The expert’s opinion should clearly link the breach to the harm suffered by the patient.

Timely Filing:

  • The Certificate of Merit must be filed within 90 days of filing the initial complaint.  Just file it with the complaint, there is no reason to wait.

Format and Content:

  • The certificate must include a written report from the expert detailing their findings and conclusions.
  • Ensure that the report is clear, concise, and addresses all relevant aspects of the standard of care and causation.

Affidavit of Qualified Expert:

  • Alongside the Certificate of Merit, file an Affidavit of Qualified Expert.
  • This affidavit should state the expert’s qualifications and their opinion that the standard of care was breached.

More Samples and Information

More Information on Malpractice

client-reviews
Client Reviews
★★★★★
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information