Moreover, it was understood by all that the momentary display of the slide was due solely to an inadvertent error by counsel in editing the slides to comply with the Court’s pretrial ruling. ... Plaintiff’s purported failure to provide discovery ...

At Miller & Zois, our accident and medical malpractice attorneys file our discovery requests with our Complaint to expedite the process. ... Defense lawyers ask questions regarding the car accident itself, personal injuries claimed, and many questions regarding the plaintiff’s ...

Rule 5-803(b)(4) permits statements made by the declarant that are for the “…Purpose of Medical Diagnoses or Treatment” to be received into evidence. These include statements “ ...describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensation....” Telling the ...

At the same time, Miller said the case very easily could have deadlocked on the causation issue -- whether there was a design defect as the plaintiffs claimed, or the defense theory of human error.

If one side or the other thinks that the trial judge made a legal error in conducting the trial, they may take an appeal.

These FAQs are designed for personal injury victims of auto accidents, truck accidents, and victims of medical malpractice. ... ( FAQ ) To recover damages as a consequence of an accident or medical malpractice in Maryland you must have suffered ...

The course claims that the accident was actually the driver's error. ... Miller & Zois Personal Injury Trial Verdicts & Settlements $10,000,000 Malpractice Verdict $8,000,000 Car Crash Verdict $5,500,000 Surgical Mistake Verdict $2,500,000 Medical Mistake Verdict $2,500,000 Malpractice Settlement $2,100,000 ...

They are experienced in treating injured patients, provide quality care, and have systems in place that make our jobs as personal injury lawyers easier (providing medical records in a timely and painless fashion for example). Furthermore, they will provide medical ...

Her medical treatment may last for the next two years. ... Claims that have little to no change of success before the M.I.A. include claims: 1) that boil down to a valuation dispute, 2) wherein the carrier uses a software ...

The court agreed that the instruction was prejudicial and constituted reversible error because the jury likely speculated as to whether the driver could have avoided the accident at the last minute.