Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Nursing Home Whistleblower Cases

If you have evidence that a nursing home or long-term care facility is providing grossly negligent care, overbilling, or engaging in other fraudulent practices, you can bring a whistleblower lawsuit and get a percentage of any money awarded in the case. Whistleblower plaintiffs in these cases are usually employees at the nursing home, but anyone with direct knowledge of fraud or neglect at the facility can potentially bring a case.

Nursing Home Liability Under the False Claims Act

Under a federal law called the False Claims Act (FCA), companies that receive money from the federal government can be subject to civil liability if they obtain that federal money through fraud or false pretenses. The FCA authorizes private citizens with knowledge of fraud to come forward and act as whistleblowers. FCA whistleblowers can become civil plaintiffs and file suit on behalf of the federal government. If the FCA lawsuit is successful, the private whistleblower plaintiff gets to keep up to 30% of whatever money is awarded.

Nursing homes and other elder care facilities receive a significant amount of their revenues from the federal government through Medicaid reimbursement. This means that nursing homes can be liable under the FCA if a whistleblower plaintiff can show that the facility received Medicaid funds improperly. If the whistleblower’s lawsuit is successful, he or she can recover money on behalf of the government and keep up to 30%.

Nursing homes can be held liable under the FCA for receiving Medicaid reimbursement (or other federal government funding) when the nursing home was not legally entitled to receive the funds. There are basically 2 categories of nursing home liability under the FCA: (1) fraudulent billing; and (2) inadequate care.

(1) Fraudulent Billing

Nursing homes can be sued under the FCA if they knowingly engage in fraudulent billing practices to receive Medicaid reimbursement. Fraudulent billing by nursing homes involves any deliberate scheme to obtain reimbursement that the facility is not legally entitled to through deception or false pretenses.

Nursing home billing fraud can come in many varieties and circumstances. Below are some of the more common fraudulent billing schemes at nursing homes:

  • Upcoding: Upcoding is very common billing scheme in which the nursing home basically overcharges for services or treatment actually rendered. Typically, what happens is the facility provides a service or treatment to a patient and when they bill Medicaid for it they use a billing code for a different, more expense procedure or treatment. EXAMPLE: doctors have 15-minute medication consults with a patients which are billable to Medicaid at $250 but the facility regularly bills Medicaid for 30 minute consultations at $500.
  • RUG: another common type of billing fraud is where a nursing home improperly classifies a patient in the highest Resource Utilization Group (RUG) to increase the level of reimbursement the facility gets for treatment.
  • Medically Unnecessary Treatment: another very common way nursing homes defraud Medicare and Medicaid is by performing services or treatments on patients that are not medically necessary. This is done to increase revenues.
  • Phantom Billing: in some cases nursing homes bill Medicare and Medicaid for patient treatments or services that were never actually provided to the patient.
  • Kickbacks: another type of fraudulent nursing home practice involves providing or receiving illegal kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals or other types of medical decisions.

Nursing homes that engage in these types of fraudulent or deceptive billing practices cost the federal government an estimate $60 billion every year. If you have inside or direct evidence of a nursing home engaging in any of these fraudulent billing practice or otherwise getting improper Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement, you can become a whistleblower and bring a FCA lawsuit.

(2) Inadequate Care

Nursing homes can be sued under the FCA if the provide negligent or inadequate care to patients at the facility. These types of FCA cases are known as “false certification” cases. Here is a basic summary of how false certification cases for inadequate care at nursing facilities work.

All federally approved nursing homes are required to comply with various regulations and rules regarding minimum levels of patient care and safety. If a facility fails to comply with these requirements, they can potentially lose their approved status and no longer be eligible for federal program payments.

Each time an elder care facility requests reimbursement from Medicaid or Medicare, the facility must certify that it is fully compliant with all applicable regulations regarding patient care and safety. If the nursing home is blatantly ignoring those regulations but certifying that they are in compliance for the purposes of receiving, that is considered fraud. The facility is basically making a false claim in order to get money from the federal government. This is exactly the type of fraudulent conduct that whistleblower lawsuits can be based on.

If you have direct knowledge that a nursing home is providing negligent care in violation of federal health and safety regulations, you can become a whistleblower and bring an FCA lawsuit.

Nursing Home Whistleblower Settlements & Verdicts

Below are summaries of actual nursing home whistleblower lawsuits under the FCA which resulted in publicly reported settlements or verdicts. These cases represent just a small sample of the hundreds of nursing home FCA lawsuits that get filed around the country every year.

  • Anthony v. Health Service Management (Texas 2017) $5,000,000: Operator of several nursing homes in Texas failed to provide adequate care to patients, including proper infection prevention and treatment, basic hygiene, and nutritional services. Former employee became whistleblower and filed case under False Claims Act. Investigation found that nursing homes billed for services that were not provided or which were so substandard and deficient that they were considered worthless and potentially harmful. Facility operator agreed to $5 million settlement.
  • Morgan-Lee v. Whittier Health Network (Massachusetts 2016) $3,500,000: former employee brought whistleblower case against nursing home for submitting inflated bills to Medicare for therapy services that had not been provided to patients in order to increase profits. Case eventually settled for $3.5 million.
  • U.S. Ensign Group (California 2013) $48,000,000: Whistleblower brought FCA case against large nursing home company. Case alleged that company set goals for administrators that could only be met through Medicare fraud. These goals referred to the target amount of Medicare reimbursement they were expected to achieve daily. In order to meet the goals, managers offered incentives to rehabilitation therapists and other staff to achieve higher Medicare targets, which they could only do by billing at higher rates or by extending therapy longer than patients required. Administrators who met the goal were rewarded with benefits such as all-expenses paid vacations. The case was eventually resolved in a settlement for $48 million.

Maryland Nursing Home Whistleblower Lawyers

If you have inside knowledge of a nursing home engaging in fraudulent billing or providing inadequate care in violation of federal regulations, you can become a whistleblower plaintiff. Call our False Claims Act lawyers today for a free consultation.

client-reviews
Client Reviews
★★★★★
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information