Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Malpractice Case in Prince George’s County Involving MILD Back Surgery

Clay v. National Pain and Spine Centers

(Filed January 13, 2016)



  1. National Spine & Pain Centers, LLC (NSPC)
  2. Dimensions Healthcare System d/b/a Laurel Regional Medical Center
  3. The treating NSPC doctor

Hospitals Where Patient Treated

Summary Of Plaintiff’s Allegations

A Howard County man with a history of back complaints seeks treatment from a physician who is board-certified in pain management and anesthesiology. The doctor suggests selective nerve root injections into Plaintiff’s lower back. Plaintiff undergoes several of these injections. Plaintiff experiences no complications from any of the injections, and each injection is successful in significantly relieving his pain.

Still, the doctor recommends surgery. The procedure is a minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD). As the name suggests, the surgery is typically relatively low risk, although it seems odd that the doctor would recommend surgery given the patient’s success with more conservative treatment.

There is no record of an informed consent indicating the risks of the procedure. Even more disconcerting is the operative report indicating that the procedure is performed at a different level than the intraoperative film showed.

Following the procedure, Plaintiff is unable to stand. Plaintiff is transferred to a tertiary care center and is diagnosed with cauda equine syndrome– a rare disorder involving nerve roots in the lower spine, usually a surgical emergency. Subsequently, Plaintiff develops urinary and fecal incontinence.

Plaintiff files a medical malpractice lawsuit in Prince George’s County alleging that Laurel Regional Medical Center and its doctor violated the standard of care by (1) recommending that the surgery be performed when Plaintiff was obtaining significant relief from epidural injections, (2) failing to obtain proper consent from Plaintiff, (3) failing to perform the procedure at the intended and proper level of the spine, and (4) puncturing the dura (outermost membrane surrounding the spinal cord) during the procedure.

As a result of the Defendants’ negligence, Plaintiff developed cauda equine syndrome, has undergone corrective surgery, had trouble walking, and experienced bladder and bowel incontinence. Plaintiff has incurred surgical, medical, rehabilitative, and other related expenses.


  • Surgical ProcedureRecommending that the surgery be performed
  • Failing to provide informed consent to Plaintiff on surgical procedure
  • Failing to perform procedure at intended and proper level of the spine
  • Puncturing the dura (outermost membrane surrounding the spinal cord) during the procedure

Specific Counts Pled

  1. Medical malpractice against Dimensions Healthcare System d/b/a Laurel Regional Medical Center the doctor and National Pain and Spine Centers.

Additional Comments

  • The Defendants will argue that these were known risks of the procedure, but if there really was informed consent and the doctor performed the procedure at the wrong level, Plaintiff has a strong liability case.
  • The causation hill may be the greater challenge for the Plaintiff’s malpractice attorneys. After corrective surgery, all of his symptoms have resolved except for his back pain which was significant enough to undergo the procedure in the first place. The expert report filed with the Complaint does not thinly slice the extent to which this permanent injury is causally related to the malpractice. This will be key to the value of the claim.
  • The claims against Laurel Regional Hospital may not survive. They are based on the doctor’s failure to obtain informed consent, “approving” an “experiential procedure,” and allowing non-medical staff in the operating room.

Plaintiff’s Experts And Areas Of Specialty

  • Lawrence M. Kamhi: a New York-based interventional pain management specialist who does not appear to have an extensive history as an expert witness.

Getting A Lawyer For Your Malpractice Claim

If you have been harmed by a surgical error, we can help you get the justice and compensation you deserve. Miller & Zois has a history of results, earning large verdicts and settlements in surgical malpractice injury and wrongful death cases. Speak to an attorney today at 800-553-8082 or get a free, no obligation online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information

  • Get information on surgical malpractice cases in the Baltimore-Washington area.
  • What is the most you can get for a malpractice claim in Maryland?
  • Take a look at another 2016 lawsuit, this one involving back surgery
  • This is a 2017 lawsuit after a laminectomy ends in a poor result.  The plaintiff, who brings his claim without a lawyer, argues that 
  • Get the breakdown on one more 2016 back surgery lawsuit 
  • CALL 800-553-8082 or get a free online medical malpractice injury and wrongful death claims. We handle claims throughout the entire state of Maryland.
Client Reviews
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information