Charlestown Community Inc

709 MAIDEN CHOICE LANE
CATONSVILLE, MD 21228
(410) 247-9700

Charlestown Community is a retired community situated on a 110-acre campus, and offering a fitness center, an indoor pool, as well as yoga classes, poker games, and six restaurants where you can get a "delicious, healthful chef-prepared meal," Charlestown Community sounds more like a vacation resort than a nursing home or assisted living facility. There has always been a lot of good chatter in the Baltimore area about this retirement community.

Charlestown Also has a 174-Bed Nursing Home

So is Charlestown as good as it says it is? Apparently yes -- based on the most recent Medicare survey, which gave Charlestown an overall 5-star rating. This facility may not be perfect, but Medicare says it is "much above average" and, antecdoically, our nursing home lawyers believe this is true. This does not mean, of course, that mistakes cannot and do not happen that can give rise to and injury or wrongful death lawsuit. But it does mean that you or your loved one are probably much safer at Charleston than you average nursing home.

  • Compare this nursing home to Catonsville Commons, it largest rival in Catonsville, that is two miles away down Frederick Road
Enviable Score

Although this nonprofit is technically owned by Charlestown Community, it is managed and operated by Erickson Living since April, 2010. At 157 on last official count, Charlestown's resident population was higher than both the state and national averages - but with 110 acres supporting numerous amenities, Charlestown has plenty of room for all.

In addition to the amenities, of course, Charlestown provides health care services, and has scored high marks in doing so. In the most recent standard Medicare inspection (April, 2015), Charlestown was tagged with just 3 deficiencies - an enviable score compared with the averages for the U.S. (7.1) and the state of Maryland (11). Charlestown also beat the state and national averages on fire safety.

On staffing, overall, Charlestown got a 4-star rating. It came in just slightly below state and national averages on total nurse time per resident per day, and significantly lower on RN time per day (41 minutes daily, versus 59 minutes statewide, 51 minutes nationally). Charlestown got a 3-star average rating for RNs, which really is no very good. Nursing homes often go cheap on RNs but I'm surprised to see this move from Charlestown. But it exceeded or equaled the state and U.S. averages on time spent by LPNs and LVNs (licensed practical nurses, licensed vocational nurses), certified nursing assistants, and physical therapists.

Above the Norm

For quality measures, Charlestown received 5 stars overall. For short-stay residents, Charlestown was better than the state and national norms in seven of the nine measured categories. It especially excelled in improving residents' functionality, and in having lower (that is, better) rates on outpatient ER visits, residents' pain reports, and usage of antipsychotic meds. In administering flu and pneumonia vaccines to short-stayers, Charlestown came in around average.

For long-stay residents, Charlestown had several Medicare scores that spiked higher (that is, less good) than the state and national averages: in cases of incontinence (84.5 percent, versus 58 percent statewide, 46.6 percent nationally); the number of resident falls with injury; and the number of residents experiencing serious weight loss.

But Charlestown was significantly better than the state and national norms for other key metrics affecting long-stay residents, including preventing urinary tract infections (with only one-third as many cases as the state and national averages) and on limiting the ongoing use of catheters. Charlestown long-termers were only one-seventh as likely as the state and national averages to report having significant pain. They were less than half as likely as average to have depressive symptoms; and far less likely than average to receive antianxiety or antipsychotic meds. Charlestown scored a perfect zero percent on using physical restraints (versus 0.6 percent statewide, 0.8 percent for the U.S.).

All told, the numbers support this facility's claim that "It's not hard to be active at Charlestown."

Hiring an Elder Neglect and Abuse Lawyer in Baltimore

Nursing Home This is a good nursing home by all accounts. But mistakes, sometimes unbelievable mistake, happen in good nursing homes. Do you have a nursing home lawsuit against this Catonsville nursing home? We are here to help you get justice and compensation for the harm you have endured. Call Miller & Zois today at 800-553-8082. You can also can get a case review online at no cost or obligation.

More Information
  • This retirement community's website
  • You have to take nursing home reviews with a grain of salt. But usually they are skew negative. People speak well of this nursing home.
  • Get inside information on more nursing homes in Maryland
  • Wrongful death nursing home claims in Baltimore
  • Getting top dollar for nursing home negligence and abuse claims: what is the trial or settlement value of your assisted living or nursing home lawsuit?
  • Call our senior care lawyers today at 1.800.553.8082 or get a free online case review if you believe you may have a potential nursing home lawsuit in Maryland. There is no a cost or fee or any kind unless we get money damages for you.
1 Vital Statistics
Number of Beds: 174 certified bedsrating information

Beds in the nursing home that have been approved by the federal government to participate in Medicare or Medicaid.

Accepts: Medicare and Medicaidrating information

Shows if the nursing home participates in the Medicare, Medicaid, or both.

2 Key Ratings
Star Rating Summary
Overall Rating rating information

A rating of 1 to 5 stars based on the health inspection, staffing, and quality measures ratings combined into one. More stars are better.

5 StarsMuch Above Average
Health Inspection rating information

A rating of 1 to 5 stars based on the nursing home’s health inspection results. More stars are better.

5 StarsMuch Above Average
Staffing rating information

A rating of 1 to 5 stars based on the nursing home’s staffing hours for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). More stars are better.

4 StarsAbove Average
RN Staffing rating information

A rating of 1 to 5 stars based on the amount of time Registered Nurses (RNs) spend with residents as reported by the nursing home. More stars are better.

3 StarsAverage
Quality Measures rating information

A rating of 1 to 5 stars based on resident assessment data that show how well the nursing home cares for residents’ needs. More stars are better.

5 StarsMuch Above Average
3 Key Short Stay Statistics
DescriptionCharlestown Community IncMD
Average
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain.
Lower percentages are better.
5.5%14.2%
Percent of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened.
Lower percentages are better.
0.9%1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine.
Higher percentages are better.
80.2%82.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the pneumococcal vaccine.
Higher percentages are better.
70.4%81.2%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication.
Lower percentages are better.
0.7%2.2%
4 Key Long Stay Statistics
DescriptionCharlestown Community IncMD
Average
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury.
Lower percentages are better.
5.1%2.9%
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection.
Lower percentages are better.
1.5%4.5%
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain.
Lower percentages are better.
0.9%6.4%
Percentage of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers.
Lower percentages are better.
4.4%6.8%
Percentage of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder.
Lower percentages are better.
84.5%58.0%
Percentage of long-stay residents who have/had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder.
Lower percentages are better.
0.5%2.5%
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained.
Lower percentages are better.
0.0%0.6%
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened.
Lower percentages are better.
19.8%22.3%
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased.
Lower percentages are better.
16.4%18.7%
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight.
Lower percentages are better.
9.5%6.3%
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms.
Lower percentages are better.
2.0%4.8%
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication.
Lower percentages are better.
10.2%18.3%
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine.
Higher percentages are better.
98.0%95.0%
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the pneumococcal vaccine.
Higher percentages are better.
94.1%92.2%
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication.
Lower percentages are better.
9.5%14.1%
5 Inspection Summary

Date of standard health inspection: 04/23/2015
Total number of health deficiencies: 3
Average number of health deficiencies in MD: 10.6

Contact Us For a Free Consultation

If you are hurt in a serious accident or are the victim of medical malpractice, contact our team of lawyers to discuss your case.
Call us now for help at (800) 553-8082

You can also get a FREE no obligation on-line consultation.

Client Reviews

  • They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives.
    ★★★★★
  • Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for.
    ★★★★★
  • Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone!
    ★★★★★
  • The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million.
    ★★★★★
  • I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois.
    ★★★★★
  • The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable.
    ★★★★★
  • The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement.
    ★★★★★
  • Miller and Zois is the best firm in the state of Maryland, and without their support, understanding, and just being there when I needed encouragement, I truly do not know how I would have succeeded without them.
    ★★★★★