The purpose of his page is to look at the trial and settlement compensation payouts in cases where a scar, specifically a facial scar, is a primary injury in dog bite and car accident cases.
From a legal settlement valuation standpoint, no two scars are the same. Even identical scars are not the same. The settlement value of a scar on an 85-year-old man will be different from the value of the same scar on a 24-year-old woman.
Here are the significant factors in determining the settlement amounts in these injury claims:
- Age: The younger you are, the greater the value of the case
- Permanency: If the scar can be removed with ease by a plastic surgeon, that will decrease the compensation payout. Conversely, a permanent scar will have much greater value.
- Gender: Juries, lawyers, and insurance companies are sometimes sexist. Whether this is right or wrong is not the issue. It is the way it is. So it impacts the value of the case. Women get more money in scar cases than men do.
- Marital Status: Again unfair. But juries are going to give more money to someone who has not yet found a spouse.
- Location: The more visible the scar, the greater the value of the claim will be to the insurance company and the jury.
- Severity: Self-explanatory.
A facial scar on a child is generally worth more than the same scar on an adult. A good deal of research has been conducted looking at long-term consequences of facial disfigurement on the emotional, social, and even financial, as we will talk about in a second, well being of children. There are even studies that show that children with scars from acne have diminished employability. In our looks-obsessed culture, job interviewers correlate attractiveness with competency and skill.
Given this prejudice, are their other damages available in facial scarring claims beyond pain and suffering? If you have or expect to go into a career that emphasizes a significant degree of public contact and face-to-face interaction, that has an impact on compensation payouts. Vocational rehabilitation experts can calculate the expected loss of earning capacity you can expect from the disfigurement.
Let's also talk for a second about surgical scar revisions, particularly those that have not been done at the time of settlement. Surgical scar revision does not guarantee that the scar will be significantly improved. Many scars can never be able to be completely removed. Sometimes, the stigmata of the scarring and injury will remain after surgery.
Hopefully, after reading all of this, you understand that there is no per stitch scar compensation calculator. Permanent scar compensation will always be based on the specific facts of the claim.
There was data published a few years back that the median settlement and verdict in facial scare cases is $20,000 in Maryland and $32,000 in Virginia.
This compensation statistic is pretty much useless. Our lawyers don't keep our law firm's average settlement for facial scarring is multitudes higher. We cannot remember ever settling a case with a facial scar that was not about the median result in Maryland.
Here are some sample cases to look at and compare to your case. Keep in mind these cases were selected very much at random, and you can't necessarily glean much from them. Still, our lawyers think they are helpful and help people better understand what these cases are worth.
If you have a facial scar and you want to better understand the value of these claims, sample settlements and verdicts can help you better understand the typical ranges of these cases.
Facial injuries are in motor vehicle collisions are difficult to value for settlement using the standard techniques lawyers use to calculate estimated settlement payouts because a facial scar rarely stands alone. If the accident was serious enough to cause damage to the victim's face, there are likely other significant injuries.
Dog bite cases often give a little bit clearer picture because it is more likely to be an isolated injury.
Our practice is focused on injury claims in Maryland. Our lawyers have not included our cases on this list because of confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements.
- 2021, New York: $52,500 Settlement. A 7-year-old cyclist fell on an uneven concrete sidewalk outside of a home. She sustained facial scars, a concussion, and bruising. The girl’s parents alleged liability from the homeowner. She claimed he negligently maintained the unsafe sidewalk
- 2021, Connecticut: $45,193 Verdict. A man was bit by a dog in his owners’ front yard. He suffered facial lacerations and scarring. The man alleged liability against the dog’s owners. He claimed they failed to warn of the dog’s vicious nature and restrain him. The defense denied liability. A jury ruled in the man’s favor.
- 2021, Pennsylvania: $15,000 Settlement. A 2-year-old girl sustained facial lacerations from embedded glass in a car accident, causing facial scarring.
- 2021, New York: $710,000 Settlement. A one-year-old boy touched the radiator in his mother’s apartment. He suffered second-degree forehead, cheek, wrist, and hand burns. The boy sustained forehead and palm scars. His mother sought compensation against the apartment complex owners. She claimed they negligently managed the building and allowed the existence of dangerous conditions.
- 2021, New York: $75,000 Settlement. A 6-year-old boy fell in a childcare center’s play area. His face struck a bench. The boy sustained an eyebrow laceration. He developed a permanent scar. The boy’s father alleged negligence against the childcare center. His lawsuit contended they failed to hire enough staff and improperly supervised the children.
- 2020, California: $160,000 Bench Verdict. A 7-year-old houseguest was bit by the homeowners’ dog. She suffered facial, head, and neck lacerations. The girl underwent stitches. She was left with facial, head, and neck scars. The girl’s mother suffered emotional distress. She alleged negligence against the homeowners. The girl’s mother claimed they failed to restrain their dog and warn of its vicious nature. Following a bench trial, the court awarded $160,000.
- 2020, New York: $200,000 Settlement. An 11-year-old girl was bit by a dog. She suffered right face and lip lacerations. The girl was left with facial scarring and disfigurements. She developed severe emotional distress. Her mother alleged negligence against the dog’s owners. She claimed the dog attacked her unprovoked and the dog’s owners failed to restrain it.
- 2020, Pennsylvania: $950,000 Settlement. A 17-month-old daycare student attempted to grab an item from his teacher’s desk. A cup of hot tea spilled on him. The boy suffered facial, neck, chest, abdominal, and arm burns. He developed scars throughout his body, including on his face. The boy’s parents alleged negligence against the daycare. They claimed it negligently allowed its employee to place hot beverages on surfaces to protect against the exact harm this child suffered.
- 2019, Maryland: $100,474 Verdict. This is a bouncer in a strip club battery case on "The Block" in Baltimore. Translation: probably an unsympathetic plaintiff. He suffered facial scarring after a battle with a bouncer. The pain and suffering damages were only $30,000. The rest was in medical bills and lost wages so the award was pretty unimpressive.
- 2018, Connecticut: $364,000 Arbitration Award. The plaintiff is at her friend's house when she is bit on her face by the owner's 35 pound Portuguese Water Dog. She receives stitches and plastic surgery and other treatment for the scar. An arbitrator awarded $364,094. The award is comprised of $14,094 in past economic damages (there are rarely high medical bills in dog bite cases) and $350,000 in pain and suffering damages - $150,000 in past non-economic damages and $200,000 in future non-economic pain and suffering damages. National Grange provided homeowner's insurance to the dog owner and paid the arbitrator's award.
- 2017, Maryland: $500,000 Verdict. A 46-year-old man is riding a bicycle on the sidewalk and is hit by a driver taking a left turn in from of him. The plaintiff took the $50,000 policy from the at-fault driver and brought an underinsured motorist claim against Liberty Mutual. His primary injury was a large scar on his forehead.
- 2016, Oregon: $576,457 Verdict. A 29-year-old male’s job duties include filling a tanker truck with CO2 from a high-pressure tank. He connects all of the equipment to his truck. He turns on the CO2 valve and the steel hose. The metal adapter attached to the tank shoots up and hits him in the face. He sustains a fractured jaw that requires reconstructive surgery, fractured teeth, chest bruising, and a large visible scar with nerve damage in his jaw. He claims that the hose and adapter struck him while the defendants claim it was a dust cap. The plaintiff brings a lawsuit alleging the driver did not properly reconnect the hose. A jury awarded the man $76,457 in economic damages and $500,000 in non-economic damages.
- 2015, Michigan: $200,000 Settlement. This is a boat accident case. A woman in her 40s is a passenger on a pontoon boat taking a relaxing late-night ride. During the ride, all lights are properly lit, and the boat is moving at a slow pace. Suddenly, the plaintiff looks back after hearing a loud engine and sees another boat speeding toward the same small section of the lake. It crashes into the boat the plaintiff is riding on, causing it to capsize. The plaintiff is thrown into the water, as are the other people on her boat. She becomes trapped under the surface momentarily. She suffers head and neck trauma, a facial laceration, and fright as a result. The facial laceration over her left eye leaves a one-and-a-half-inch permanent scar. She sues the drivers of the other boat for negligence and piloting the boat while intoxicated. The parties settled for $200,000, the remainder of the defendant’s policy limits after the owner of the boat also sued the defendants and settled for $100,000.
- 2015, California: $105,000 Verdict. A twenty-two-year-old woman is at her boyfriend/defendant’s home. She is sitting on the ground with his pet pit bull and practicing tricks when it bites her forearms and the right side of her face. The woman sues her boyfriend. He argues that they had been together for years and that the woman was familiar with the dog and that she teased the dog causing the attack. She is hospitalized for three days and has reconstructive surgery on her right eye socket. As a result, she is left with a two-centimeter scar near her right eye. A jury finds that the man was solely responsible for the attack, and awards the woman a payout of $105,000.
- 2015, New York: $95,000 Settlement. A six-year-old girl is crossing the street on her scooter when she is struck by the defendant’s vehicle. As a result, she sustains facial fractures to her right frontal bone, cranial fossa, right orbital bone, and right maxillary sinus, leaving her with facial scars. She files a claim against the defendant, alleging he failed to yield the right of way and that he was operating the vehicle at an excessive speed. Defendant denied the allegations, but the parties settled for $95,000.
- 2015, New York: $75,000 Settlement. A ten-year-old boy is a passenger in a vehicle when the defendant crashes into the vehicle. The boy sustains a laceration to his face and residual facial scars in addition to strains and contusions due to the impact. He alleges that the defendants were negligent. Defendants disputed the damages, but the parties settled for $75,000.
- 2015, New Jersey: $41,500 Verdict. A 20-year-old girl is in a restaurant. She approaches the bar. She is struck in the face with a wine glass by the defendant. Defendant was in an unrelated dispute with another restaurant guest. Defendant immediately leaves and is subsequently pleaded guilty to assault. The woman also sues the owner of the restaurant for the failure to provide adequate security. After the incident, the girl is taken to the hospital. She is left with a permanent facial scar even after undergoing cosmetic surgery.
- 2015, New Jersey: $41,000 Settlement. A fifteen-year-old girl is bitten in the face by a Rottweiler mix dog while visiting her grandmother’s house, and she sustains facial lacerations as a result. Her plastic surgeon states that she will need corrective surgery. She sues her grandmother and the owners of the dog, claiming that the owners were told to put the dog away while she was in the house. Defendants claim that she was familiar with the dog. During arbitration, the case resolved for a settlement amount of $41,000.
- 2014, South Carolina: $93,000 Verdict. An 11-year-old boy was the back seat passenger of a vehicle that was struck and overturned. The vehicle, destroyed in the accident, showered the youngster with glass. Despite immediate treatment and surgery, the boy suffered permanent scarring and disfigurement to his face, arms, and legs that will require future treatment for scar revision. Plaintiff’s family filed suit claiming $20,854.77 in past medicals and an approximate $10,150 in future costs for scar revision treatment. The defense admitted liability.
- 2013, Pennsylvania: $15,000 Verdict. A 10-year-old girl is injured when the vehicle she is riding in strikes a State Farm-insured vehicle that made a left-hand turn in front of them. She sustains a concussion and facial laceration as the result of the accident. While the concussion prevents her from participating in karate lessons for approximately six months, the facial scar is the crux of the case. The stitches that she received in her bottom lip create a lesion-type scar on the right side of her lower lip, with a linear scar continuing diagonally outward from the center of her chin. Nineteen when the case goes trial, she claims that the facial scar affected her a great deal over the years. She claims it looked like a bad cold sore at times, and classmates often made fun of her. She claims that when she met people, they would stare at her scar, making her self-conscious. Though she underwent scar revision surgery six years after the accident, she always intended to pursue career opportunities in modeling and now cannot due to permanent disfigurement from the scar. The defense, who stipulated to liability, cross-examined the plaintiff tha she remained popular in school, before and after the surgery. It is a ridiculous argument. But someone it worked.
- 2012, Virginia: $300,000 Settlement: Plaintiff is operating a small car. As he proceeds through a green light, he is struck by a large cargo van. Among other injuries, Plaintiff suffers closed head trauma resulting in a concussion, facial lacerations requiring sutures, and a hematoma under the scalp. Plaintiff additionally suffers a closed fracture of the upper humerus, resulting in a 15% impairment rating. Plaintiff’s facial lacerations require cosmetic surgery due to a misalignment of the eyebrows. Plaintiff claims $56,717 in past medical expenses, $5,965 in lost wages and $17,850 for future medical/cosmetic treatment. The defendants, the van driver, and the driver’s employer admit liability and agree to a $300,000 settlement.
- 2011, Florida: $1,050,000 Verdict. Plaintiff, a 32-year-old realtor, sustains facial lacerations when he is struck in the face with a glass during a fight while at a nightclub. He sustains six facial lacerations, leaving 10 inches of permanent scarring. He files suit against the club for negligent security, contending that the attack was foreseeable as there have been prior fights and attacks. He claims facial nerve damage, difficulty with raising his eyebrows and the corner of his mouth, and that his features are not slightly irregular on one side of his face. He claims a strange taste in his mouth though he can eat and speak normally. Defense counsel contends that the proper security measures were in place and that the incident boiled over in a matter of seconds and could not have been prevented. The jury awards $150,000 in lost wages, $100,000 in past and future medical bills, and $800,000 in past and future pain and suffering.
- 2011, California: $1,234,952 Verdict. A 44-year-old unemployed woman’s pickup truck flips when she is struck by a police vehicle responding to an emergency call. The police officer, exceeding speeds of 100 mph, merges onto a left shoulder to avoid a motorcycle that moves into his lane. When the officer attempts to steer back into the lane, he loses control, skids across the highway, and strikes the plaintiff’s truck. The truck flips onto a guardrail, bounces off, and skids on its roof for approximately 100 feet. Plaintiff sustains multiple lacerations to her face, as well as a partially severed ear. She is hospitalized for two days and undergoes a total of four procedures to repair and reconstruct her ear and facial lacerations. She additionally has glass removed from her face and scalp. A reconstruction expert determines that the motorcyclist would have been unable to see the approaching police vehicle due to the officer’s speed. The defense does not dispute the extent of the plaintiff’s physical injuries and disfigurement and agrees her medical treatment was reasonable. Instead, the defendant's attorney argues that the officer was properly responding to an emergency call and that the accident would not have occurred if not for the unsafe and illegal maneuver by the motorcyclist. The jury awards the plaintiff $34,952 in economic damages and $1,200,000 in non-economic damages.
Whether the insurance company will cover a facial scar depends on the insurance policy and the extent of the scar on your face. Insurance will sometimes cover facial scarring if the scar significantly alters the victim's appearance. But some insurance companies view facial scars -even permanent disfigurement - as a cosmetic procedure that is not covered.
The typical settlement value of an injury resulting in significant facial scarring is between $40,000 to $150,000. However, personal injury lawsuits involving very severe, disfiguring facial scarring can have much higher settlement amounts.
The single most important factor driving how much a facial scar is worth in a lawsuit is the extent and severity of the scarring. Cases involving major scarring that totally disfigures the victim’s facial appearance will be worth much more than cases involving minor scarring. Here are some additional factors that determine the value of these cases:
- Age: the younger the victim is, the greater the value of the case.
- Permanency: if the scarring is permanent and cannot be surgically improved the case will have a much higher value.
- Gender: female victims tend to get higher awards for facial scarring compared to males
- Location: a scar in the center of your face has great value than a scar on the side of your face (or your lip, which usually masks the scar).
- Mitigation: settlement amount and jury awards are higher when the victim has exhausted efforts to reduce the scarring.
Yes. If the facial scar was caused by someone else’s negligent conduct (e.g., a car accident where the other driver was at fault) then you can sue that person and hold them liable for the costs associated with the facial scar.
If you got a scar on the job, you can bring a claim but a workers' compensation settlement is likely to provide less compensation than a civil claim.
If you have facial scars and other injuries, you need the best possible lawyer to help you get what you deserve. As you can see, the value of facial scar injury cases vary wildly, and one of the reason is the quality of the victim's legal counsel.
Our dog bite and car accident lawyers have handled many of these cases, and we know how to fight to get as much money as we possibly can in these cases. Call our Baltimore-based law firm at 800-553-8082 or get a free claim evaluation online.