Melanoma Misdiagnosis Lawsuit Filed in Maryland in 2016

Hanlon v. Anonymous Doctor
(Filed January 11, 2016)
Jurisdiction
  • Howard County
Defendants
  • A dermatologist
  • The dermatologist office
Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

This is a failure to diagnose melanoma cancer case. Plaintiff, a resident of Ellicott City, Maryland, goes to a dermatologist for evaluation and treatment of an apparent lesion on his left cheek.

Plaintiff presents to Defendant's office eight times over the course of the next five years. During none of these eight visits does Defendant recommend the performance of a biopsy. Instead, Defendant simply treats the apparent lesion with liquid nitrogen.

Defendant finally recommends a biopsy when Plaintiff returns for his 9th visit. The biopsy reveals that Plaintiff's lesion is cancerous. Plaintiff undergoes a series of surgical procedures over the next two years (approximately) to remove the cancer from his cheek. After the surgeries, another biopsy is performed which reveals that the cancer is still malignant.

Plaintiff files a medical negligence lawsuit alleging that Defendants violated the standard of care by continuing to treat Plaintiff with liquid nitrogen for years and failing to perform a timely biopsy of the legion. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants failed to appropriately obtain informed consent when they failed to notify Plaintiff of various alternatives and risks involved in the various modalities of treatment.

Plaintiff alleges that as a result of Defendants' negligent acts he has suffered a severe shock to his nervous system and great pain and mental anguish. Plaintiff also alleges that as a result of Defendants' negligence he has been subjected to numerous unnecessary procedures, unnecessary hospitalizations, medical care expenses, and suffered a loss of earning capacity.

Negligence
  • Failed to properly diagnose his cancer
  • Mistreated for several years; failure to perform timely biopsy
  • Failure to obtain informed consent
Specific Counts Pled
  1. Negligence
  2. Informed Consent
Additional Comments
    Concerned Person
  • The standard of care does not require the excisional biopsy for every lesion, and we do not know from the Complaint the nature of the lesions. But nine times?
  • The doctor may make some interesting statute of limitations arguments in this case. The dermatologist negligence in treating this patient arguably began back in 2007. The injury was discovered by the patient in 2013. Only the last two visits to the dermatologist fall within Maryland's five year statute of repose in medical malpractice cases.
  • Melanoma is a deadly form of skin cancer. Melanoma lesions are most commonly found on the back, extremities, the head, and the neck. Melanoma typically appears to have notched borders and to be asymmetrical with a mixture of colors that may include of tan, brown, blue, black, red, pink, gray or white. Melanomas may ulcerate and bleed. They may be flat, but melanomas can become nodular. Melanoma can spread via the blood vessels and through the lymphatic channels and nerves, along the vessel channels or by direct invasion. The cancer cells are most likely to spread to the lymph nodes, which are the most common sites of metastasis. Like virtually every cancer, the key to survival is timely diagnosis and treatment. If allowed to proliferate, cancer will metastasize to remote locations including the liver, the brain, the bones, and the intestines. If not appropriately diagnosed and treated, melanoma can be an extremely deadly disease.
  • The standard of care is going to depend on the characteristics of pigmented skin lesions. Test doctors utilize what is called the ABCDEs of melanoma. This test provides an objective assessment of pigmented and dark skin lesions.  The purpose of the test is to determine the likelihood of a lesion being melanoma.
Hiring a Lawsuit to Fight for You

Have you or someone you loved suffered at the hands of a negligent doctor or nurse in Maryland? If so, fill out our free online case review or call us at 800-553-8082. Talk to our medical malpractice lawyers and get information about your options to pursue a settlement or verdict for the harm that has been done to you.

Information On Your Malpractice Claim
  • What is the value of medical negligence claims in Maryland?
  • See examples of cancer misdiagnosis verdicts in Maryland
  • Take a look at other cancer misdiagnosis lawsuit filed in 2016 in federal court in Baltimore
  • Howard County is not known for being a plaintiff-friendly venue. Take a look at the value of injury and death claims in Howard County
  • CALL 410-779-4600 or get a free online consultation for your claim

Contact Us For a Free Consultation

If you are hurt in a serious accident or are the victim of medical malpractice, contact our team of lawyers to discuss your case.
Call us now for help at (800) 553-8082

You can also get a FREE no obligation on-line consultation.

Client Reviews

  • They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives.
    ★★★★★
  • Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for.
    ★★★★★
  • Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone!
    ★★★★★
  • The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million.
    ★★★★★
  • I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois.
    ★★★★★
  • The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable.
    ★★★★★
  • The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement.
    ★★★★★
  • Miller and Zois is the best firm in the state of Maryland, and without their support, understanding, and just being there when I needed encouragement, I truly do not know how I would have succeeded without them.
    ★★★★★