Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Da Vinci Surgeries and Why Hospitals Are a Part of the Problem

Our law firm is handling da Vinci robotic surgery lawsuits. At one time, these were product liability lawsuits.  Now, our lawyers are only handling da Vinci surgical system lawsuits in which there are catastrophic injuries or wrongful death and a doctor or hospital is to blame.  We are not handling da Vinci product liability lawsuits.

da Vinci Surgeries and Why Hospitals Are a Part of the Problem

Technology is about the biggest and latest thing. That’s why we upgrade our cellphones, get the latest iPad, and demand bigger televisions. It’s also why hospitals can’t help themselves. They continue to flock to da Vinci robotic surgery system in droves, and they force their physicians to learn the technology. 

Without a doubt, the technology is impressive. If you can stomach watching actual surgery, this hysterectomy is a video demonstration. If you can’t stomach it, watch this to watch a Johns Hopkins surgeon use it to play the “Operation” board game (never mind that it doesn’t look properly connected to the board game). 

We have daily Google Alerts for daVinci, and it seems like every day – even now – another hospital puts out a press release that they are equipped and ready to use the system. The question is, are these hospitals rushing in with a blind eye toward their own liability and (more importantly) patient safety?

Inadequate Training

There are many problems with da Vinci surgical systems. We’ve seen cases where the product itself malfunctions, whether because a knife breaks off during surgery, or an electric charged is passed to the patient, causing severe internal burns. Putting those problems aside for the moment, the largest concern and cause for injury appears to be inadequate training

Doctors are effectively being forced to use the machines, whether they are properly trained, and regardless of whether they feel comfortable. The hospitals who buy the machines want to get their money’s worth, and they want to be able to tout their use of these machines. The more surgeries the device is used for, the better the hospital’s “statistics” for their brochures and other marketing. 

Many doctors familiar with the da Vinci robotic surgery system have opined that competence with the device requires between 200 and 750 surgeries. Our lawyers doubt that most hospitals are investing that in that degree of training. The first 750 patients are essentially “practice cases.” You can bet those patients are not told about the number of robotic surgeries performed by their doctor.

Informed Consent

The FDA reports almost 5,000 deaths and adverse events because of the da Vinci devices. Patients go into surgery believing the hospital’s hype about minimally-invasive procedures, tiny scars, and quicker recovery times. 

To be sure, a good experience may be marginally better than standard surgery. However, the risks are significant, and patients are not properly informed about the risks and alternatives. The real question is whether robotic surgery is worth it. 

A Johns Hopkins study revealed that “There’s never been a study showing clinical superiority. For the patient, there’s clearly no difference.” 

Patients should be told that there are between two and five deaths per month with the da Vinci. These devices are most commonly used for common and routine procedures that should rarely, if ever, result in death: hysterectomies, prostate surgeries, and laparoscopic surgeries.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information