Arbitration Clauses and Maryland Car Insurance Contracts

Without question, insurance companies would much prefer to arbitrate its personal injury cases in Maryland. Arbitrations require less time spent by the insurance companies lawyers and, if mandatory, would deprive Maryland personal injury auto accident victims the right to present their case to a jury of the victim’s peers.

Accordingly, insurance companies have attempted to write into the insurance policy language an arbitration clause when the insured person needs to bring a claim with its own insurance company because of personal injuries suffered as the result of an uninsured or underinsured motorist.

Some states allow this. In fact, arbitration is required in uninsured motorist cases in Illinois, Colorado, California, and Massachusetts if the policy language requires arbitration. Texas is reportedly considering such a rule. But, in Maryland and 22 other states, insurance companies are prohibited from imposing arbitration. There is a statute - § 19-509 of the Maryland Insurance Code - that forbids insurance companies from inserting binding arbitration clauses in insurance contracts with their own insureds. In other words, Maryland public policy rewrites these contracts.  

This is a good rule. Maryland's court system is a good one. It has well-established rules of evidence and procedural safeguards that plaintiffs are not going to get in arbitration, even with a fair and reasonable arbitrator because, by definition, the arbitration is a shortcut procedure to justice.

Does this mean arbitration is not an ineffective tool for plaintiffs in personal injury cases? No. Our law firm arbitrates (and mediates) many personal injury car accident cases with insurance companies because it is often an effective means of resolving the dispute. But we do so on our terms without bowing to the insurance companies and their handpicked arbitrators. 

Law in Other States

These are a few states that require mandatory arbitration for uninsurd motorist benefits and how the law in that state works.

  • California: Auto insurance policies providing for uninsured motorists coverage are required to provide that the determination as to whether the insured is legally entitled to recover damages,  is to be made by agreement between the insured and the insurer, or, in the event of disagreement, by arbitration conducted by a single neutral arbitrator. If the insured makes a Section 998 settlement offer and that offer is not accepted, and the arbitration award is more than that offer, the victim is not precluded from recovering additional costs even if the final number exceeds the coverage limits.  
  • Colorado: If insurance policy contains language that requires arbitration before the insurer is obligated to pay uninsured motorist benefits, Colorado law will enforce this agreement.  The insurance company is obligated to pay for the arbitrator.  
  • Illinois: The Illinois Insurance Code requires that no motor vehicle insurance for uninsured motorist benefits can be renewed, delivered, or issued for delivery unless there is language that requires any dispute with respect to the coverage and monetary damages be submitted for arbitration to the American Arbitration Association.

Key Maryland Uninsured Motorist CasesMore Information on Maryland Uninsured Motorist Cases

Contact Us For a Free Consultation

1Free Consultation

2Available to talk NOW - 24/7

3No fees unless you WIN

Miller & Zois clients have received over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements. Let us fight for you!

Client Reviews

★★★★★
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
★★★★★
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
★★★★★
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
★★★★★
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
★★★★★
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
★★★★★
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
★★★★★
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa