COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations by phone or video for your safety & convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Construction Site Car Accidents

Construction Site

Accidents at construction sites on the roadway are particularly hazardous. Cones and signs jut out into the roadway and may distract or confuse motorists. Worse, sometimes construction site material ends up in the roadway and can become dangerous road blocks. If you or someone you love has been in an accident at a construction site or work zone in Maryland, you should read this article to see if you have a claim.

This article addresses:

  1. The Perils of Construction Site Car Accident Cases [jump to]
  2. What Sort of Construction Site Car Accidents Lead to Big Settlements and Verdicts [jump to]
  3. Who Pays When Construction Site Car Accident Cases Are Resolved? [jump to]
  4. Sample Settlement and Jury Outcomes in Construction Car Accident Cases [jump to]
Overview of Construction Site Car Accidents

When roads and highways need to be improved, it just isn’t practical for the entire roadway to be shut down. Instead, to accommodate motorists, construction sites only partially obstruct the lanes of traffic that they are working on, while leaving other lanes open to traffic. There are usually a number of large orange cones and signs that instruct motorists on how to proceed through a construction or work zone. These cones and signs can often be confusing to motorists and, worse, may become dislodged and create an unavoidable roadway hazard.

Often, these types of accidents can be deadly. Nationally, crashes in highway work zones have killed 4,700 Americans and injured 200,000 in the last 5 years. In 2009 alone, there were 667 fatalities caused by construction site car accidents. Approximately 85 percent of people killed in work zone accidents are the motorists, not the construction workers. Therefore, it is you, the motorist, who is at the greatest risk of death or injury due to an accident at a work zone or construction site.

When Construction Site Accidents are Dangerous to Car Drivers

The following are examples of extremely serious freeway accidents:

Construction Site Car Accidents
  • An orange construction cone falls down into an open lane of traffic and, in attempting to avoid the cone, two drivers collide.
  • A large sign signaling a construction zone is blown off the ground by the wind and lands on an unsuspecting driver’s windshield, injuring him.
  • A motorist becomes confused due to unclear construction site signals and ends up traveling into oncoming traffic and suffers a head on collision.
Construction Site Example Case

On a blustery Wednesday morning in February, Nolan is out for a ride on I-270 heading north. Nolan, off from work for the day, needs a break from his Washington D.C. suburb and decides to take a ride up to Prince Frederick County and take in some of the fresh air and farm land that goes for miles. As he merges onto I-270 from I-495, he sees signs that say there is a large construction zone coming up in 5 miles. Nolan is traveling about 50 MPH, 15 MPH below the speed limit, as he approaches the work zone.


As he does so, he sees a number of construction workers in hard hats and neon yellow jackets working in the construction zone which has taken up the entire far right lane of traffic. They are barricaded from the open lanes with large orange traffic cones that look to be rather heavy. Nolan merges from the right lane of traffic, which is closed, into the middle lane of traffic. As he merges, he can feel and hear a huge gust of wind shake his vehicle. In that same instant, Nolan looks in front of him to see that one of those large orange cones has blown over and is rolling from the closed right lane of traffic into the middle lane of traffic where Nolan is now traveling.

Nolan doesn’t have enough time to come to a complete stop. He can either swerve to the right and barrel into the construction zone and the workers, or he can swerve to the left and try to blindly enter the fast moving left lane of traffic. Nolan is understandably afraid of both options, but he decides it is better to take his chances in the fast lane of traffic than to hit and likely injure and kill the construction workers. As he merges left with his fingers crossed, his vehicle is hit from a behind by a commercial truck which Nolan just cut off. The large truck smashes into Nolan’s rear bumper and propels him into a concrete divider. Miraculously, he survives, but he severely injures his spine, causing nerve damage throughout his lower extremities. Nolan will require significant and long term therapy and treatment for his injuries.

Those injuries can be traced back to the construction company’s failure to properly secure its cones to the roadway. Absent that carelessness, Nolan would have enjoyed a day off and not been sent to the hospital with life altering injuries.

What Kinds of Construction Crashes Lead to Large Settlements?

Victims of accidents want to know right away if they have a claim and, if so, how much that claim is actually worth. The answer is that it depends.

If there is an accident at a construction site on the roadway, the first question to ask is how did it happen? If it occurred because the construction site was negligently or carelessly maintained or monitored, then you have a claim. If the accident is your fault because you were speeding or otherwise being careless, you cannot recover in Maryland due to what is known as contributory negligence.

As to the degree of compensation, if the victim of the accident is not the one at fault, the amount of money awarded depends on what injuries were suffered. How serious were they? How much medical care was needed? How much pain have you been in? More serious injuries require more expensive medical care, more time off from work, and cause more conscious pain and suffering. Therefore they receive larger verdicts and settlements.

Sample Verdicts and Settlements In Freeway Accident Cases

Here are examples of jury awards to victims of construction site motor vehicle collision cases:

  • $390,000 Out-of-Court Settlement in Maryland. Our client was riding a motorcycle on Route 795 which is a highway in Baltimore. While getting on the ramp to the Baltimore Beltway, a road construction vehicle cuts through the "emergency only" cut-through. This was foolish, of course, but not necessarily the kind of negligence that causes a crash. But this driver takes it to the next level and pulls out directly in front of our client. Why? When you are doing something illegal on the road, you tend to want to do it quickly. Our client suffers hip and elbow injuries and gets road rash from falling off his bike onto the highway. He was a good guy out for a ride with friends. He was hardly the image of a crotch rocket motorcyclist who is going 1,000 miles an hour. The big defense was weak: plaintiff was speeding. The case settled in mediation for $390,000.
  • $225,000 Out-of-Court Settlement in Maryland. The defendant thought it wise to leave a front end loader on the middle of the highway without warning or lights. Our client's vehicle - he was a passenger - plowed into the back of the front end loaded. We sued the driver and the construction company. The client suffered serious facial injuries that, thankfully, healed well.
  • $2,884,500 Verdict in Maryland: A 41 year-old construction worker was working on his assigned construction site. While standing at the bottom of a hill, he turned to see a dump truck rolling in his direction. Unfortunately, the man did not have enough time to react and was struck and dragged at least 40-120 feet before his co-workers were able to flag down the driver. He consequently passed from his injuries, leaving behind his wife and two children. The man’s estate sued both the driver and the construction company for negligence. Plaintiffs alleged the driver failed to place the truck in reverse, which would have sounded the backup warning, and instead placed the truck in neutral. They also alleged that the driver failed to properly observe his surroundings before and while backing, as co-workers testified they heard the decedent shouting “stop” before being struck. The defendants argued that the decedent should not have been standing in that particular location, and failed to properly observe traffic on the construction site. Defendants claimed that the accident could have been 100% avoided if the decedent had been aware of his surroundings. After a bench trial in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, the decedent’s estate and family were awarded $2,884,500.
  • $1,950,000 Verdict in North Carolina. A female plaintiff suffered a permanent traumatic brain injury when her eastbound vehicle was struck from the rear by a tractor-trailer on an interstate highway. The accident was caused when the defendant contractor's rig slowed to 15 mph in the fast lane and then turned into the median to fumigate a wildflower bed. The defendant was responsible for traffic control under the contract with the fumigation contractor and trucking company. The plaintiff contended that the defendant was negligent when it failed to give motorists advance warning that the fumigation truck would be slowing down and turning into the median. (McLendon v. NC,)
  • $150,000 Verdict in North Carolina. A young male plaintiff suffered paraplegia when the westbound vehicle in which he was a passenger overturned after it lost control on an unpaved roadway in a construction zone, maintained by the defendant, on a public interstate. The plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to warn of the low shoulder inside the area of construction, failed to provide adequate lighting of the work zone, failed to post caution signs, and failed to guard against a known dangerous condition. (Womble v. Larco.)
  • $2,375,547 Verdict in Pennsylvania. A 49 year-old vice president of a bank in Tennessee was riding in formation with his friends while on a bike tour of Central Pennsylvania. While traveling on a two-lane road through Perry County, he approached an active construction work zone. In the opposing lane, a woman is stopped after a construction vehicle pulled onto the highway in front of her from a farmer’s lane. In an attempt to avoid the slowdown caused by construction, the driver of the vehicle behind her crossed the double yellow line, only to strike the motorcycle head-on. The motorcycle driver suffered from lumbar, neck, and thoracic fractures that required him to wear a brace for several months. More significantly, he also sustained a crush injury to his left leg so severe that it resulted in a below-knee amputation. He must now wear a prosthetic and has been advised that a full leg amputation could be necessary in the future. The man brought the driver of the vehicle that struck him to suit for motor vehicle negligence as well as the construction company that was performing road work in the area where the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed that the driver was negligent in his attempt to enter the opposing lane of traffic. He also claimed that the constriction company had violated regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), claiming that the driver of the construction vehicle had pulled out into a blind spot at the base of a large hill, creating a traffic hazard. He alleged that at the time of the accident, the construction signs had already been taken down in the defendant driver’s direction, even though flagmen were still picking up cones, thus creating another safety hazard. The defendant driver claimed that the only reason he crossed the double lines was in an attempt to avoid colliding with the vehicle that suddenly stopped in front of him. The defendant construction company argued that at the time of the accident, the construction had been completed and was properly opened according to PennDOT regulations. The suit proceeded to trial where a Pennsylvania jury found the construction company 65% negligent and the defendant driver 35% negligent, resulting in a $2,375,547 verdict.
  • $700,000 Wrongful Death Settlement in Texas: The parents of ten children were traveling north on a four lane highway with one of their sons riding in the back passenger seat. Without notice, a large dump truck exited its company work site and in an attempt to merge into the traffic, drove across several lanes only to practically roll on top of the family’s car. The minor child in the backseat was lucky enough to walk away with a laceration to his scalp, but unfortunately, his parents did not make it. The parents’ estate brought the driver of the truck to suit for motor vehicle negligence and the construction company for vicarious liability for negligently entrusting their truck to the driver. Plaintiffs alleged the driver failed to yield the right of way. They also claimed that in his movements, he slowed down and/or stopped suddenly, not allowing the decedents enough time to react to his irresponsible movement. The defendants denied all liability and claimed that the decedents were acting negligently and driving at an excessive speed. They argued that had the decedents been driving at a slower speed, they would have been able to properly control their vehicle and avoid collision. The parties chose to settle their dispute before trial in the amount of $700,000. The settlement included an agreement where the four surviving minor children will receive monthly payments.
  • $50,813 Verdict in Maryland. A 40 year-old man was driving down a hill in his Rosedale neighborhood one evening. Suddenly, he found himself facing an oncoming vehicle and a construction container inconveniently placed in the middle of his lane of travel. In an attempt to avoid colliding with the oncoming vehicle he was unable to prevent striking the construction container. The collision resulted in the man suffering from a fractured hand and a concussion. He sued the construction company shortly thereafter for neglecting to properly place warning signs and/or lights around the container. He claimed that even if he had not been in the accident, it was just a matter of time before someone else would experience a similar outcome. The defendant construction company claimed that the plaintiff knew the container was in the street, as it was his residential neighborhood, and should have stopped at the sight of oncoming traffic. A Towson jury found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded him $50,813.
Getting a Lawyer For Your Claim

If you have been the insured on a construction site either as a pedestrian/employee or if you were injured as of a result of a negligent contruction operation, call someone who will stand beside you and fight the insurance companies for you. Call 800-553-8082 or get a free case evaluation online.

Related Articles and Samples
Client Reviews
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa