Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Four Elements on Negligence to Prove a Car Accident Claim

Negligence Elements for Car Accidents and Other Tort Cases

In Maryland and every other state, financial liability for auto accident injuries hinges on negligence. If you want to hold someone responsible for an accident, you must show that they committed the tort of negligence.

Four Elements of Negligence

Four Elements of Negligence

To bring a personal injury claim on negligence, you must prove the four elements of negligence:

  1. the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff
  2. the defendant breached that duty,
  3. plaintiff suffered actual injury or loss, and
  4. defendant’s breach was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury

Duty - Element

The first element of negligence requires that the defendant owed some type of duty or obligation to the plaintiff under the circumstances. We never argue about duy in an auto accident lawsuit – this element is virtually automatic. Whenever you get behind the wheel and drive on public roads, you owe a duty to drive safely and follow the traffic rules to avoid injuring other drivers. So all drivers must reasonably protect other drivers on the road whenever they are operating a vehicle.

Breach - Element

The 2nd element of negligence requires a showing that the defendant breached the duty owed to the plaintiff. This is always the most critical element in auto accident cases. This element is almost always established by showing that the defendant violated a traffic law by failing to yield, failing to stop for a red light, etc. These Rules of the Road are outlined in Chapter 21 of the Transportation Article of the Maryland Code. Failure to obey the traffic rules is a breach of the defendant’s duty to drive safely and avoid harm to others.

The breach of duty element can be established even without violating any traffic laws. A defendant can breach their duty if they fail to operate their vehicle safely and avoid accidents that a reasonable person would avoid. This is the critical issue our attorneys face in a car accident lawsuit: whether the defendant driver violated this reasonable person standard. The determination as to whether the defendant has breached this rule is usually resolved by the jury (or in smaller cases, a judge).

Injury - Element

The 3rd element of negligence requires that the plaintiff have an actual physical injury related to what happened. If the plaintiff is not actually injured, there is no tort of negligence. For example, let’s say driver A pulls out in front of driver B. Luckily Driver B is somehow able to swerve out of the way and just barely avoid a collision with a Mack truck. Driver A clearly breached his duty, so elements 1 and 2 are present. But Driver A was not hurt, so element three cannot be established.

Keep in mind that the plaintiff’s injuries must be physical. Emotional distress from almost getting into a deadly accident is not enough to bring a negligence claim. A plaintiff can get additional damages for emotional distress if it is related to physical pain and injuries.

Causation - Element

The 4th and final element of negligence is causation. This requires the plaintiff to show that the physical injuries he has were actually caused by the car accident (and not some pre-existing condition). This element is often a battleground in auto accident cases, particularly those involving back and neck injuries.

Example of Four Elements of Negligence in Auto Accident Cases

Let’s take a common example to illustrate how causation defenses usually play out. Driver A rear-ends Driver B (a clear breach of duty). Driver B claims that the accident caused a herniated disc injury in his back. However, the medical evidence proves that Driver B had got the herniated disc years before the accident and it was not reaggravated. This means that Driver B’s herniated disc was not caused by Driver A’s negligent driving. There is no causation so negligence is not established.

The fact that the plaintiff’s disc injury is pre-existing does not necessarily prevent them from establishing causation. If they can show that the injury was made worse or reaggravated by the accident, then the proximate cause element of negligence would be satisfied.

Getting an Experienced Lawyer on Your Side

If you have been harmed or lost a loved one in a personal injury case, you need the best possible lawyer on your side to prove these four elements of negligence.  So do your research. Find out who the best personal injury lawyers in Maryland are and decided who you want to fight for you. If that search leads you to Miller & Zois, call us immediately at 800-885-8082. You can also get a free online consultation.

Client Reviews
They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives. Terry Waldron
Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson
Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens
The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger
I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer
The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen
The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa
Contact Information