Eye Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit

Wallick v. Johns Hopkins Hospital

(Filed January 4, 2017)

This is an ophthalmologist malpractice case filed in Baltimore City by a man residing in New Jersey. This case was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 4, 2017. It is the second medical malpractice case filed in 2017 in Maryland.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

Plaintiff is a 64-year-old male with a history of double vision. He has been diagnosed with divergence insufficiency (meaning his eyes point in the same direction). Plaintiff consults with defendant doctor to discuss treatment options, and defendant doctor recommends surgery.

The eye surgery is performed. However, plaintiff alleges that during the procedure, defendant doctor improperly placed sutures in his left eye that come loose and caused a divit in the sclera (the white part of the eye). Defendant doctor then performs a second procedure to retrieve the sutures, but he again improperly utilizes the wrong tool for the repair. While performing the corrective procedure, he lacerates plaintiff's sclera with a tool and damages the retina. After failing to repair these issues, he calls for an evaluation by a retina specialist who finds retinal tears with subretinal fluid and hemorrhage.

As a result of this, plaintiff no longer has vision and is permanently disabled. He faces substantial extraordinary medical and care expenses.

Additional Comments
  • Divergence insufficiency is considered a supranuclear palsy. The supranuclear eye movements are involved in keeping our eyes in proper position. The human visual system has to alternate quickly between convergence and divergence to properly focus on targets of different distances. In patients with divergence insufficiency, the patient cannot focus on objects and have poor depth perception. The problem is distance or near depending on which deficiency they manifest. In divergence insufficiency, the patients will often have difficulty with distance vision or double vision at a distance though not at near. This can be managed with prism in glasses, but without the prism the patient will have double vision.
  • The defendant doctor is an older doctor with a resume as long as your arm. The Wilmer Eye Institute is world renowned and Baltimore jurors know it. Given these facts, the liability case needs to be very strong for plaintiff to overcome the halo effect of this doctor and this medical facility.
  • Medical malpractice lawsuits against ophthalmologists are not particularly common. This is not because they do not commit malpractice but because they are generally hard to prove.
Jurisdiction
  • Baltimore City
Defendants
  • Patient doing an Eye ExamJohns Hopkins Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation
  • Board certified physician in ophthalmology
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Johns Hopkins
Negligence
  • Failure to properly suture plaintiff's eye
  • Failure to appropriately evaluate plaintiff's condition
  • Negligently lacerating sclera and damaging the retina
  • Negligently failing to repair damage
  • Negligently failing to provide appropriate care
Specific Counts Pled
  • Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you or a loved one suffered and you suspect the negligence of a doctor, nurse or hospital? Miller & Zois can help you get the justice and compensation for the harm you have endured. We have a long history of results in medical malpractice cases in Maryland. Call us today at 800-553-8082 to speak with a caring attorney or get a free online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information

Contact Us For a Free Consultation

If you are hurt in a serious accident or are the victim of medical malpractice, contact our team of lawyers to discuss your case.
Call us now for help at (800) 553-8082

You can also get a FREE no obligation on-line consultation.

Client Reviews

  • They quite literally worked as hard as if not harder than the doctors to save our lives.
    ★★★★★
  • Ron helped me find a clear path that ended with my foot healing and a settlement that was much more than I hope for. Aaron Johnson ★★★★★
  • Hopefully I won't need it again but if I do, I have definitely found my lawyer for life and I would definitely recommend this office to anyone! Bridget Stevens, Google User ★★★★★
  • The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger ★★★★★
  • I am so grateful that I was lucky to pick Miller & Zois. Maggie Lauer, Google User ★★★★★
  • The entire team from the intake Samantha to the lawyer himself (Ron Miller) has been really approachable. Suzette Allen, Google User ★★★★★
  • The case settled and I got a lot more money than I expected. Ron even fought to reduce how much I owed in medical bills so I could get an even larger settlement. Nchedo Idahosa ★★★★★
  • Miller and Zois is the best firm in the state of Maryland, and without their support, understanding, and just being there when I needed encouragement, I truly do not know how I would have succeeded without them. Shannon Brown ★★★★★